ehind this principle is to establish a classroom culture wherein students would be more aware and afraid of violating the school law regarding cheating and plagiarism. Doing so, the students would be more careful in terms of obliging with the school policy.
Although maintaining a good relationship with the students is necessary in terms of encouraging the students to build trust with their professors, school teachers should be clear that it is their responsibility to draw a line between being lenient and strict. Through the proper use of school teachers’ authority in class, it would be easier for teachers to win the students’ cooperation not to violate the rule behind cheating and plagiarism. Upon involving the students to participate in classroom discussion regarding the school policy behind cheating and plagiarism, it is also possible to encourage other students to report any person they know who is cheating or plagiarizing their school paper by giving them rewards (Forsyth, Increasing Academic Integrity, 2002).
2. On page 211, Forsythe presents 3 case studies (originally defined by Carbone, 1998) of ways to manage civility / incivility in the classroom. From a psychological standpoint, why do you think each of these will be effective or not? (Feel free to use whatever theoretical approaches you are comfortable with/subscribe to?). Personally, for you, which of these methods, or blending of methods seems the most useful?
From a psychological standpoint, creating a classroom norm is effective since the students are made aware of what to expect each time they decide to violate the classroom and school policy. Since the practice of incorporating rewards and punishment in a classroom norm makes the students aware that violating one of the school and classroom rules is equivalent to a specific punishment, the students would think twice before they decide to misbehave in class or cheat in their academic papers. For this reason, most teachers find this technique
Based on your readings about cheating and ethics (Chapter 7 and 26 in McKeachie), to what extent is it your ethical responsibility to deter cheating and encourage academic integrity? What specific things can you do in your classroom to achieve this?
To encourage academic…
Nevertheless, certain theories are gradually becoming out of date in response to the newest technological advancements, whereas the others can be extrapolated to any type and epoch of commercial and managerial settings. The present paper is designed to discuss two motivation theories, which are goal-setting and cognitive evaluation theories.
brutality is prominent. The Romans view themselves as civil in contrast to Goths who are seen to be less civilize. However, as the story in the play unfolds, the civility of the Romans is put to question. This theme is introduced by Marcus
In a way, it is seen that motivation influences the outcome of people depending on the type and amount of the motivation in question. In the video, it is however seen that such a theory does not always work in all situations. The study shows that
An individual’s motivation would be ineffective if it doesn’t inculcates three basic ingredients; intensity, direction and persistence of effort (Klein 152). Therefore, one needs to induce the three preceding components to
The author states that the credibility of results is the most important aspect of academics. Scholars must ensure that they maintain the integrity in academics by ensuring that they provide original work and also credit other people works. Integrity in education is closely related to leadership and success in public life.
4 pages (1000 words)Assignment
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Assignment on topic /Fostering Motivation, Civility, and Integrity for FREE!