Allen Lopez has proved himself to be a conscientious employee, concerned about discrimination based on age and gender against other lower level employees. This quality in an employee needs to be cherished and encouraged by the management, since the members of most organizations…
Only on failing to get results, he began attacking the management through his new Website, to bring the public’s attention to injustices at ExtremeNet. Based on Allen Lopez’s selfless and continued concern for his subordinates, the ruling is that Lopez should be allowed to continue working for ExtremeNet.
According to moral absolutism, some actions are morally wrong to perform, “even when performing them would bring good results” (Timmons, 2002, p.80). Similarly, Kantian deontology states that a good person’s tendency to follow moral rules will prevent them from breaking the rules even for the sake of ensuring good outcomes (Darr, 2005). Thus, it is against professional ethics for an employee to cause the ridiculing of his company, his seniors or his colleagues, with subsequent decline in the company’s profitable functioning.
Further, Allen Lopez could have chosen to raise awareness about discrimination among the lower level employees who were laid off, and organized collective action against the management’s approach, to avoid publicity. The ethical concept of “loyal and faithful service” (Mead & Sagar, 2006, p.141) to one’s organization was violated by Lopez. Therefore, Allen Lopez should be asked to apologize at his satirical Website to the executives of ExtremeNet, for ridiculing them and the company, and subsequently remove the satirical Website from the worldwide web.
Utilitarian teleology states that it is wrong to steal, to lie, etc. However, it allows “exceptions in the odd cases where the rules interfere with happiness rather than promote it” (Garofalo & Geuras, 1999, p.61). Similarly, according to moral relativism, right and wrong depend on the moral code of a culture (Timmons, 2002). The executives at ExtremeNet should raise the levels of the company’s ethical culture, so that they can expect the same ethical behavior ...
Cite this document
(“Employee Loyalty - Arbitration Paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/403447-employee-loyalty-arbitration-paper
(Employee Loyalty - Arbitration Paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
“Employee Loyalty - Arbitration Paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/403447-employee-loyalty-arbitration-paper.
Courts must support and supervise the arbitration process so as to ensure the integrity of the arbitral process and protect the public interest. Nevertheless, this should not sacrifice or prejudice confidence of the users of the arbitration process. Consequently, the level of judicial control should not be too high (Ping Han 2007).5 Arbitration Act 1996 is aimed towards limiting the courts intervention in arbitrations, defining the courts role as supportive rather than supervisory.
The macroeconomic benefits of the human loyalty principals are already apparent in some economies, especially the United States and United Kingdom where there are huge amount of transactions taking place each day and human components are equally involved in this parameter along with their mechanical counterparts.
s often the one marketing executives strive for, it is often found that customers have different relationships with different brands and it is the strongest relationship between company and client which survives even when the product quality has suffered or the competition has
There are numerous arbitration and mediation agencies, some established or connected with the national government. These agencies are devoted to settle disputes between two conflicting parties without the need of going through
Although the process is conducted out of court, the parties are both given an opportunity to participate in a hearing and they are allowed to give evidence. The arbitrators award in arbitration cases is often final and courts rarely reexamine