The author could find out differences as well as similarities, (especially as a study on human group life) in the findings of the sociologists regarding symbolic interactionism. Blumer forms the thesis of the book by stating that, “There has been no formulation of the position of symbolic interactionism, and above all, a reasoned statement of the methodological position of this approach is lacking” (p.1). The author, in this book attempts to study the topic by dividing it into three stages. First stage is an attempt to outline the nature of symbolic interactionism, then identifying the guiding principles of methodology in the case of empirical science, and finally discussing the methodological position of symbolic interactionism (p.2).
While reading through the pages of the book, it is understood that Blumer mainly focuses on three core principles to the theory namely, meaning, language, and thought. Regarding the nature of symbolic interactionsm, Blumer exposes three premises. Blumer firstly identifies that meaningful communication occurs in context. Secondly, meaning arises out of social interaction. Thirdly, interpretation handles or modifies meaning. Blumer here explains how interpretation and relationship construct meaning. To make it clear, the author writes, “…human beings act toward things on the basis of the meaning of that thing” (P.3). Symbolic interactionism holds the view point that meaning is the centre of human behavior by which human beings approach things or man. The author wins in his attempt to describe the way man attribute meanings to symbols and objects from their perceptions. Groups also play a vital role in the overall process of creating meaning. This book is really effective for one to recognize the way man creating meaning in his life. Symbolic interactionism shut its door against the ...
Cite this document
(“Book Review of Original Work-Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/403821-book-review-of-original-work-symbolic-interactionism-perspective-and-method-by-blumer
(Book Review of Original Work-Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Essay)
“Book Review of Original Work-Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/403821-book-review-of-original-work-symbolic-interactionism-perspective-and-method-by-blumer.
Perhaps like other new disciplines or approaches, symbolic interactionism is fundamentally a departure from deeply held principles of the time. Indeed, the principles salient in this sociological theory are very far from the traditional type of sociology known in the early period of the 20th century.
The concept was introduced by George Herbert and Herbert Blumer. This refutes the model that humans are passive in symbolic interactionalism. It occurs in social context that mediate action. Under symbolic interactionalism, there exist shared meanings in the social world.
This theory focuses on the symbolic meaning that individuals create and use during social interaction. Symbolic interactionism understands society by focusing on the subjective meanings that individuals assign to behaviors, occurrences, and objects. Such subjective meanings are emphasized because it is assumed that individuals act according to their belief and not simply based on what is objectively factual.
Although I have experienced symbolic interactionism in different aspects of life, the most palpable experience came about when organizing a cloth donation campaign. My friends and I decided to form a cloth donation group to help the poor people in Senegal.
What will be found in this paper is that law enforcement works extremely hard to maintain an environment that provides a safe and social existence to allow for social interactions among each other and all adjoining cultures in society. Also, without law enforcement, this literature has evidenced that there would not be the improved balance that there is in life today as compared to decades ago.
Through a three-year qualitative research on homicide investigations1, Innes observes that these communicative acts serve as a sense-making apparatus for reproducing a "shared perspective" among the police. The officers, through interactions amongst themselves, with the public, and their environment, derive symbolic interpretations about the "core values" of the organization.
This means these study face to face interaction for their observations. This also throws light on the contributions of various academicians and intellectuals in the study of the Symbolic Interaction and Ethnomethodology. Ethnomethodology is
mbolic interactionism is an aspect of the social psychological theory that analyses the patterns and methods of communication, how information is perceived or interpreted by the receiver when communicated and the necessary adjustments that should exist between two endpoints
The meanings are derivatives of social interaction and may be modified through interpretation. A situation or event only has real consequences when people define it as real. The definition and attribution of reality are based on the expression of language that
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Book Review of Original Work-Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method by Blumer for FREE!