The first step is to create a question that has no judgment in it. according to Rundall et al. (2007), the question must be to the point and not too broad or narrow. In this case, the question that may be appropriate is, "Which programs that we have now are most used by our patients?" This question would get to the heart of the problem. When program managers need to cut services they sometimes cut across the board instead of looking at the changes that can be made without interrupting services.
In this step, the manager gathers information from a variety of sources. This means they are not only paying attention to their department, but they are gaining knowledge form the people who are using services as well as suppliers, colleagues, and anyone else who has a stake in the organization. This should also include the board members. According to Gudes, Kendall, Yigitcanlar, Pathak and Baum (2010), involving major stakeholders and users of services in decision making insures that information comes from diverse sources and encourages strong collaboration between those interested in the organization. Also, this collaboration insures that change is an ongoing process instead of a series of one shot deals. In a clinical setting, having several people to give information allows for an understanding of the full picture, which is very important when services must be cut.
I found that the websites in this section were very good for funding information on a global level. They provided current research that could be used to compare and contrast specific information to see the bigger picture for Medicaid and situations in a clinical setting.
Rundall et al. (2007) suggest that in this step, the organization must take a deeper look at the evidence and make sure that it is "accurate, applicable, actionable and accessible" (p. 336). This is an important step because after step 2, there will be a wealth of information
It is often the manager that must create a balance between what is happening in an organization and what they must do to stay solvent. In this situation, the manager of a department in a county…
The prospect theory on the other hand involves a situation where parties in negotiations seek the best results for themselves by consolidating their strengths and taking risk where they have weaknesses. This aims at maximizing self-interest goals of each party.
Ethical dilemmas arise when two sets of values are in conflict, requiring individuals to choose between them. At some point in their careers, some managers will make or support decisions that are not in alignment with their own values (Elizer, 2000).
Groups involved in decision making will have to think in various perspectives to come up with good decisions. Unlike personal decisions that may affect only one person, i.e., the decision-maker and some others, decisions made by groups will have positive as well as negative impact on whole lot of people including everyone in the group, the organization, customers, etc.
Affinity diagrams are critical in making decisions where groups are involved. An affinity diagram is a tool that is used to congregate large sums of information, ideas, data issues and opinions and arrange them into factions based on their natural affiliations.
As a result, the Sherriff altered and tightened the policy regarding police chases or pursuit. Accordingly, supervisors are required to any car pursuits that are not meant for violent crimes or other crimes that would be worth the pursuit regardless of the potential liability or danger.
The ethical codes accountancy organizations do not strive to deter a certified accountant within a business from appropriately fulfilling that duty, but address situations in which acquiescence with the essential ethics could be compromised. Ethical Dilemma As an accountant, one of my roles is to look into financial dealings of the business.
Common theory dictates that any addictive behavior can be considered a drug and potentially impacting the decisions that an individual makes. Alcohol, sex addiction, and traditional forms of drug abuse all pose a threat to society in one way or another. It is important to understand the reasons that people turn to drugs, the impact that peer have on our decision making ability, and the role that parents and other authority figures play in enabling individuals to turn to drugs in the first place.
On the other hand, Satisficers, are the persons who are able to take faster decisions since they know their basic needs and thus look for a decision within a minimum framework or criteria that need to be met. Once the minimum framework of criteria is met.
ative that all parties are involved in the making of the rules in order to avoid legal battles that may challenge the new rules even if they are meant to be for the good of the organization. The legal battles that the Federal Aviation Administration is embroiled with in this
It is evident from the study that Kentucky Fried Chicken Company is the huge organization which has been known around the globe. They have a decent administration, mystery formula, worldwide business system that backing KFC to be followed in the client's brain. They accumulate the entire angle to make them culminate.
12 pages (3000 words)Research Paper
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Decision Making Case Study for FREE!