Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has gone a long way since the ‘50s, when the impact of development projects on the environment has gained attention for social concern (Turnbull 2001, 3). Today, not only has EIA become a well-established process internationally (Bond…
2009, cited in Harris and Spickett 2010, 1)
The development of EIA’s methodologies and procedures originated in North America, later in Europe, mainly by ecologists whose concern in assessing the impacts of development activities focused more on human health. Similar efforts were then made for the development of health impact assessment methodologies and procedures, but this had not been as smooth as EIA’s. The (1) ‘lack of epidemiological knowledge regarding dose-response relationships’ and the (2) ill-preparedness of concerned government authorities to release documents showing in concrete figures the impact of development on the incidences of death and diseases made the latter job difficult. The first problem made it difficult to determine the effect of environmental changes on health, for example, the release of pollutants; whereas, the second problem denied hard evidences on the adverse health impacts of development. (Giroult1990, 259) Resultantly, the health components have become the main limitations of many EIA studies. A WHO commissioned study of 15 EIAs testified to this saying: “... off-site health effects generally have been given a low priority and have not been treated systematically” (cited in Giroult1990, 259). To ensure that health will be consciously considered in EIAs against these difficulties, a new approach, namely Environmental Health Impact Assessment (EHIA) was proposed. (Giroult1990, 259)
To understand this new approach, the key term – environmental health – that differentiates it from the current approach has to be defined. From Listorti and Doumani’s (2001) noted environmental health’s definition, it essentially means, as that which prevents health hazards, namely ‘increasing human diseases, injury, and premature death’, while pursuing development activities (349). Main health hazards are classified as: ...
Cite this document
(“Environmental health impact assessment.(2) Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/406748-environmental-health-impact-assessment2
(Environmental Health Impact Assessment.(2) Essay)
“Environmental Health Impact Assessment.(2) Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/406748-environmental-health-impact-assessment2.
The most significant is the wind energy potential of Scotland which owns 60 % of UK wind energy sector and specifically Whitelee which is the biggest onshore wind farm in Europe. According to Nick Medic who works at British Wind Energy Association (BWEA) the Government is looking to produce 14GW of Onshore Wind energy by similar projects (James Murray ,2010).
For example, the process of developing and legitimating scientific knowledge often assumes a set of priorities, time frame, etc., that is at odds with those that obtain in the policy environment. Even so, the use of scientific knowledge as a basis for public policy is increasingly becoming the norm.
Environmental Impact Assessment is a management tool to forecast the impact that a project will have on the environment and to find ways to reduce unacceptable impact.1 Risk Assessment is an important aspect of environmental Impact Assessment. Risk Assessment and Impact Assessment deal with uncertainty.
City Council, the Environmental Protection Department requires that the process of risk assessment and risk management should be explained to the public and the elected officials in a series of meetings. The public needs to be assured that environmental health issues pertaining
t of disregarding its limitations, the concerned citizens may on the other hand be making the risk of sweeping generalizations as to the use of invalided mathematical models about the population’s exposure.
Goldstein pointed out this dual risk when he noted, “Scientists
dence, it has become increasingly important and is rapidly evolving (Watson, 2003) in proportion to the growing clamour from environmental advocates as well as the increasing scientific validation of very imminent environmental catastrophes.
Traditionally, environmental laws
nd external walls etc, therefore, in normal cases building specifications are usually assessed buy the use of BRE’s Environmental Profiles Methods of 2008. The sustainability of the building to be constructed should be those that observe low carbon and resource efficient that
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Environmental health impact assessment.(2) for FREE!