The US spends billions of dollars on food assistance that is meant to provide healthy meals and subsidize present food purchases. The study that we will look at in this paper compares the Federal Assistance and the average BMI of those children who are receiving assistance. The current policy is meant to adhere to nutritional guidelines and assure that children are getting all of the basic nutrients that are needed for health (Kimbro, & Rigby, 2010). Recent studies have shown that in cities with high food prices, subsidizing purchases at the store may actually increase the purchase of high energy low cost foods while subsidizing school meals may provide the children with more healthy meals.
As we think about this problem it has to be ask, is the higher energy low cost food always used by those on food stamps etc and if not what predicts healthy food? There is a scoring system that can determine how healthy food intake is. This is called the NuVal scoring system where each kind of food is given a value. This study should be a correlational study that is time dimensional. It is a Quantitative Research Design. The hypothesis for this study is that it is not income that relates to obesity but increased high energy foods and decreased exercise. . There will be two comparative groups that will receive a questionnaire with a food diary and then a follow up in 6 months with another questionnaire and food diary. The two groups will include one that is low income and one that is middle income. All of the participant children will be scored with a BMI in the beginning and a waist measurement. Parents will write in the food journal everything eaten each day for 6 months. The original questionnaire will include questions about lifestyle such as exercise and TV time. Those foods eaten throughout the 6 months will be given a NuVal score and evaluated in the two groups. This will definitely need to be a