John McCormick of The Chicago Tribune reported that the Obama administration is being accused of putting the gun issue “in the back burner” and proponents of gun control are restless (27 April 2009). One of the main…
There were 280 million firearms in private hands in America in 2005 and there were only 300,000 gun crimes (Kessler 46). For Kessler, this means that at least 279,700,000 guns did nothing wrong (46). Further, Kessler added that in 89% of the crimes, the person who used the gun was not the one who bought the gun (46). Kessler interpreted the data to mean that the root of America’s crime problem is not the number of guns in the hands of American (46). Kessler’s key argument is that American should not restrict gun rights but should “deepen” instead the sense of gun ownership (47).
In a way, Jim Kessler hit the nail on the head. Indeed, deepening the sense of gun ownership will probably decrease the crime rate. However, this sense of ownership can be deepened not through liberal gun laws but by regulating people’s access to guns. This should not be interpreted as curtailment of rights. In the same way that the right to free speech is moderated by libel laws, the rights to gun ownership will have to be moderated by society’s consideration for the general good. This is because not all persons are ready enough to own guns. Not all individuals are responsible enough to have unhampered access to guns. Responsible gun ownership is promoted best not through liberal gun laws but through gun control.
In 1993, Professor Martin Killias of University of Lausanne, Switzerland, examined the correlations between household gun ownership and rates of homicides and suicides using a gun in eleven European countries, Australia, Canada and the United States (Killias 1721). Killias found that there is a positive correlation between gun ownership and the rates of homicides and suicides using a gun in the fourteen countries (1721). In citing examples, Killias pointed out that the United States homicide was 3.7 times higher than Britain and the US suicide with a handgun was 175 to 1 compared with the US (1722). He ...
Cite this document
(“Persuasive Research Paper on ( Gun Control) Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/407434-persuasive-research-paper-on-gun-control
(Persuasive Research Paper on ( Gun Control) Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Persuasive Research Paper on ( Gun Control) Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/407434-persuasive-research-paper-on-gun-control.
While statistical evidence demonstrates that many countries where stringent gun control has been enacted do have relatively low murder rates, it’s also accurate that the murder rates in these countries was already low before the gun control mechanisms were enacted.
This area, less than one hundred and fifty square miles in size, houses more than one and a half million Palestinians. A website designed to track the news of this area states that over half of its 200,000 person-per-square-mile population is made up of children, many of whom still live in the same refugee camps to which their grandparents moved after the creation of Israel in 1948 (GazaSiege.org).
Those who are in favor of gun ownership argue that the same can protect the civilians from aggression. On the other side, those who are in favor of gun control argue that gun control can reduce violence in the society. Still, modest restrictions on civilian gun ownership prove that the same cannot guarantee the lives of civilians in general.
He also ended his life in the shoot-out. This shooting was one of the deadliest shooting to ever happen in the history of America. As a result of this shooting, debate on gun control in America took shape, as a result, with a division on the gun laws in the United States.
The public opinion regarding the gun control debate has been almost equally distributed. PEW research claims in its study that 5&% of the total population sides with stricter laws, while the remaining 43% sides with relaxed laws of gun control (PEW 1). Those in the favor of strict gun control laws argue that such laws will decrease criminal incidences involving the use of guns, these laws will even ensure that those who have the capacity to make rational decisions are only armed and they even argue that criminals are not in a capacity to make rational decisions so taking away guns from them is the right option.
A tribe does not represent any homogeneity or criterion by which sects of people differentiate themselves from other sects. They are a natural formation of people who get together and affirm their obligations to unite in warfare against outsiders and acknowledge the rights of their members to compensations for injuries.
However, others believe that the increase in gun violence is even further proof that possession of a firearm is not only a right, but a necessity to protect the livelihood of families and assets. Both sides are serious in their endeavors and are engaging their local and state politicians to draft changes to the existing gun policies at the federal level.
A restrictive and stringent drug law is a deterrent to drug use and assists reduce drug associated costs and societal problems.
The basic principle of harm reduction is that there will never be a drug free society but the only way to address harms