ing proactive stance, ability to confront adversity, willingness to take risks, innovativeness to think outside the box, take a supportive and encouraging stance for new ideas, and by being creative.
As noted in several literatures, a particular leadership style is most effective depending on other factors such as the situation at hand, the personalities of the subordinates, the personality of the leader, and the objectives of the organization, the leader and the follower. In this regard, a balance in both the autocratic and democratic leadership styles would be more supportive of producing qualities that would assist leaders in being effective and successful in the future. By using the leaders’ authority, he must be aware that there are traits and qualities that would make his style succeed toward the accomplishment of well defined goals. On the other hand, by employing a democratic style, the leader encourages ideas which motivate his team to deliver results, as expected.
Leadership is the process of influencing people to work or act towards the attainment of specifically defined goals. Communication is the process of transmitting thoughts, feelings, facts, and other information through verbal or non-verbal means. The role of communication in relaying the correct and accurate messages is relevant in order to assess the leaders’ ability to move followers into the achievement of goals. Sometimes, the ways of communication using traditional means are often insufficient to transcend a variety of barriers. There is always this tendency to misinterpret messages due to diverse variances spanning from leadership and communication styles as well as personalities of personnel, specifically those from diverse cultural orientations. In this regard, leaders must use effective communication tools to ensure that the process is free from being misinterpreted accordingly.
The question that appealed the most is the determination of challenges confronting leaders