“If we execute a person, what is the difference between us and the criminal who has committed the horrifying crime of killing another individual?” (10 Pros and Cons of Capital Punishment). Sharp (1997) mentioned that “approximately 5900 persons have been sentenced to death…
Capital punishment is a controversial topic all over the world because of the immense value associated with human life. No science or technology has so far succeeded in creating an artificial life form in a laboratory setup. We have already succeeded in gathering useful information about even the distant planets in and out of the solar system; but still our knowledge about the origin of life, architecture of the life, life before birth and life after death etc are very limited. Proponents of capital punishment argue that instead of giving capital punishment, keeping the hardcore criminals in prison for a lifelong period is highly expensive and meaningless. In my opinion, considering the value and mysteries surrounding human life, capital punishment is unethical or immoral.
The essence of American criminal justice system is that “partisan advocacy of both sides on a case will promote the ultimate objective that the guilty be convicted and the innocent go free” (Ferdic et al, p.37). Criminal justice systems in most of the countries believe that even if thousands of criminals escaped, no innocent people should be punished under any circumstances. We have lot of examples in which innocent people forced to accept punishments because of the circumstantial evidences collected against them by the law enforcement agencies. We should remember the story of one of the greatest philosophers of all time, Socrates, who forced to accept capital punishment since he tried to teach the word, the truth. In other words, the existing criminal justice laws are not perfect and the loopholes may take the life of even innocent people. Life is the most precious thing in this world and once it is finished, no science or technology can regain it. In short, considering the possibility of human error in judgements, capital punishment should be avoided under all circumstances. Judiciary always declare a person as innocent or criminal ...
Cite this document
(“Against Death penalty Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/409584-against-death-penalty
(Against Death Penalty Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Against Death Penalty Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/409584-against-death-penalty.
Life is Precious.
To argue against the death penalty is to argue for what is right and just. This is the mark of a civilized and informed people. To argue against the death penalty, one must argue against people with absurdly unreasonable, underlying assumptions, with emotionally-based arguments, made nearly invisible by cultural programming.
The researcher state that he crimes that may lead to a death penalty vary from one country to another and from one religion to another. Same case applies to the methods of carrying out the execution. Some of the crimes that can warrant a death penalty are murder, treason, rape, terrorism, and even adultery in the Muslim religion.
It should be made clear that while the arguments of activists and liberal touch the very soul of every human being, facts should still be the foremost basis of judicial decisions. As crime continues to permeate society, it becomes the moral and just obligation of government to adopt death penalty as a punishment for heinous crimes because the government has the primary obligation to protect its citizens in the best possible ways known to it.
In addition, there exist a number of arguments in favor of and against death penalty. Thesis statement: Death penalty or capital punishment is a controversial issue but the same is the best possible way to provide justice to the victim, not the
Whereas, the definition of capital offenders differs, many offenders who are guilty of taking the life of others fall into the category of capital offenders. Despite that fact that capital offenders attract capital judgment decisions such as the death penalty, there are strong arguments that people have raised against this practice.
According to Dieter, the basic reason for abolishing the death penalties by many states from their course of laws is the appreciation and the understanding of human rights. Many countries like South Africa Spain, Switzerland etc have defended their act
Instead of the writer stating the facts on the ground and the actual issues that have been documented and implemented within the state regulations, he reports them as beliefs of a certain cliché of personalities that do not meet all the
Debates concerning euthanasia range from the easiest and least painful way in which an individual can be given euthanasia, to the ethical status of euthanasia. Euthanasia is prohibited on religious and ethical grounds irrespective of the
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Against Death penalty for FREE!