Incapacitation is part of the philosophy of sentencing that determines that the effect of a sentence is to positively prevent an individual from making future offenses. This is opposed to simply deferring the individual from committing offenses in the future. As such,…
In the cases that the criminal is not conditioned, by remaining in prison they remain unable to commit further crimes.
Collective incapacitation is the implementation of crime-control effects of the present criminal justice system due to incapacitation. Collective incapacitation attempts to prevent crime by increasing the rate and length of time that a broad range of offenders spend in prison. This is done without taking into consideration possible future offenses. Selective incapacitation is an altered form of incapacitation that justifies the practice of giving more dangerous and indefatigable offenders long prison sentences, some of which can be indefinite or extend over numerous life terms. Selective incapacitation focuses more on criminals who are more likely to repeat their offenses in the future or else engage in more dangerous activity upon being released from their initial prison sentence (Auerhahn, 2003). Selective incapacitation is sometimes used on people who are less likely to commit further offenses, ensuring that their one sentence is going to be enough to rehabilitate them.
Though collective and selective incapacitation both deal with the implementation of prison time to enable criminal offenders to avoid future offenses, there are differences between the two concepts. The greatest difference between collective and selective incapacitation is the purpose. Collective incapacitation is used for criminal defenders as a whole, though focuses especially on offenders that are not believed to commit further offenses in the future. Selective incapacitation is more picky, focusing on criminals that are at risk for being repeat offenders, or criminals that have no chance at repeating their mistakes after being imprisoned.
The effect of incapacitation varies from criminal to criminal (Hawkins & Zimring, 1997). The majority of criminals that ...
Cite this document
(“Incapacitation Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/409644-incapacitation
(Incapacitation Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
“Incapacitation Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/409644-incapacitation.
Thus there exist a number of theories why punishment and sentencing are imposed. The goal of the criminal justice system and the government itself is to make sure public safety. The paper is about how the state should reduce recidivism. The criminal justice system has been enforcing the process of sentencing and punishment as ways to reduce recidivism or the likelihood of the criminals to commit violation or crime again.
The understanding of the biological and psychological explanation of the causes of criminal behavior can help in enacting correctional measures which seek to rehabilitate the offender thus preventing repeat crimes. Different types of crimes have different motivations which run from economic, political, ideological, religious, ethnic motive and social motive.
In the year 2008, the Nebraska Supreme Court emphasized that the execution method involving the use of electric chair was a violation of the Nebraska Constitution. Nebraska does not have a death penalty as there is no alternative execution method on the books.
Robots have proved helpful to the daily activities of human life. Over time, robots have been incorporated in manufacturing industries and many other fields. This paper discusses the advantages of robots to education, doctors and housework. Geminoid HI-1 is an example of a robot helping in education.
Punishment is a positive reinforcement of peoples believes against offending. The philosophy of punishment is founded on how and whether punishment can be justified. There are two main approaches to justifying punishment, and these are punishment as public censure and punishment as a way of restoring the equilibrium changed by the offence.
However, since modern times have critically shaped lives based appreciably on the economic and political aspects with new conflicts and set of struggles quite distinct from those of the past, current offenders have as