He goes on to explain that there are possibilities for a wrongful diagnosis that then poses the question what do the parents do with the information? Is it ethical for a parent to make the decision for their child’s life when a mutation in a gene does not necessarily prove they will contract the disease?
David Devore was a participant in the Woodrow Wilson Biology Institute where he conducted much research on the topic in this article. He has extensive knowledge in genetics and has provided a lot of detailed information from many other sources. Devore believes genetic screening for diseases such as Lesch-Nyhan syndrome which causes mental retardation after the first few days of life is necessary and beneficial to both the parents and the offspring but that screening for diseases like alcoholism or Alzheimer’s is not beneficial and may be detrimental to the child’s life. Even though a child may possess the gene responsible for the disease does not mean they will contract it. Therefore Devore believes genetic counseling should also be available after the results are received. I chose this source because it not only describes the techniques of genetic screening but also the positives and negatives of screening for different diseases and the consequences of both choices. It provides rich information on my argument as to whether it is ethical to conduct these tests and the consequences of the parents’ decisions based on that information. I found this source on the internet in another institution publication. The only thing missing are first-hand accounts from individuals.
The article “Genetic Screening, the Social Impact of Genetic Knowledge” by Boris Sagredo describes the process of genetic screening and the use of assays to compare individuals in a population to determine a difference in the genes. Although genetic screening can predict a possibly contraction of a disorder based on the