The paper is aimed to present a comparative analysis related to practical and ethical way of living on the basis of Aristotle’s Aim of Man and Plato’s Allegory of the Cave. The views presented by the two philosophers were related to ethics which serves as a guideline and an…
the Cave, he presented the idea that people are living in a world of forms, within which the ideas that were called truths were mere projections of the reality. For that matter, he considered that the ethical way of life for man was to achieve goodness which he defied as the level of understanding the real nature of things. This he stated can be done through education (Plato 453). Aristotle on the other hand presented in the work The Aim of Man his main ideas on ethics. According to him, ethics is a form of practical science, thus he was known for his experiential approach in ethics (Aristotle 691).
Based on the views of Plato or Aristotle then, one’s way of life is more ethical and practical that another when one does not only think of one’s own goodness but contribute to the goodness of the society and the state. Through the course of the discussion then, both the views of the two philosophers will be discussed.
The differences between Aristotle and Plato can be presented on different points. The first one is in relation to the manner of achieving an ethical life. Aristotle viewed that ethics was more practical and experiential while Plato viewed that it is more theoretical.
Aristotle presented a view on ethics that is more practical and experiential. For that matter, based on his view, one’s life can be more ethical if it is more experiential. This means that a person needs to primarily focus on his or her function in the society to have an ethical life. Aristotle indicated that a man needs to be “rational and exercise his reason, not just possess it” because this is what separates him from other animals (Aristotle 700). He believed that goodness can be defined as a state wherein a particular entity maximizes its potentials and skills (Aristotle 694). One example that can be given is the profession. If a person is good in a certain field of study such as arts, he or she needs to pursue that field. In this manner, life is more ethical ...
Cite this document
(“Essay - Aristotle and Plato -ethics Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/410895-essay-aristotle-and-plato-ethics
(Essay - Aristotle and Plato -Ethics Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Essay - Aristotle and Plato -Ethics Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/410895-essay-aristotle-and-plato-ethics.
Friendship is the union of two or more person in mutual affection, love, care and remembrance of each other. The notion of friendship is deeply imbedded inside Greek and ancient philosophy and from time to time different philosophers have explored the dynamics of friendship in different manner (Eterovich, p23).
Descriptive ethics refers to the study of beliefs and behavior that are considered good or bad by a given society based on facts and actual actions. Normative ethics refers to the study of ideal beliefs against which the morality of persons and societies are measured against.
He creates a way of a utopian group, in his guide The Republic, out of his disregard for the pressure of government life. Plato preferred to cure the circumstances of both personal group and personal personality. Generally what Plato wants to accomplish is a perfect society.
Kelsen (1937) critically notes that the influence of Aristotelian philosophy has varied in its magnitude and lasting impact. While, the thinker’s stance on politics and ethics is still scrutinized upon to this day, enjoying unparalleled discussion and assessments, his once unassailable logic in the arena of sciences has been greatly challenged to the extent of extinction (Kelsen 45-50).
He was later to be the only person to rival Plato in terms of influence on Western philosophy. Human nature was a subject that made both of them interested a lot and this essay will explore what they felt about this subject.
Though there seems to be a lot of similar ground in both their thoughts yet Aristotle later markedly differed from the views of his mentor.
This paper will look at two dissimilar arguments about the human function and evaluate the dissimilar objectives of each.
Aristotle disproves Plato's Theory of Ideas on three essential bases that are the reality of ideas disagrees with itself by refuting the prospect of cancellations, his pictures of ideas are just empty descriptions and the hypothesis uses temporary concepts to generate illustrations of awareness.
This is considered the same as heresy, which Socrates was found guilty of, as heresy is a religious opinion that contradicts the beliefs and teachings of the Roman Catholic. He was an atheist and did not believe that a God, or gods, existed.
Plato was a student, or a follower, of Socrates.
The central notion in Aristotle's ethics is the good life. Everything that people do, and everything that happens to them, is of ethical significance, as Aristotle conceives of ethics, insofar as it helps or hinders or is part of the good life. An act or occurrence may matter ethically even if it is involuntary; it will not then deserve praise or blame, but it may affect the value of life.
He discusses morality on the basis of voluntary and involuntary actions. He also believes that virtues are of two kinds, intellectual and moral virtue. Apart from involuntary and voluntary criteria, there is another criterion that Aristotle