The US-Mexican drug problem has become so acute that senior ranks in the power echelon have come openly with such remarks as the Mexican President, Felipe Calderon, made on waging a war with the drug cartels and Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State in the Obama Administration,…
The toll of drug-war related deaths has reached 28,228 since January 2007, as based on data analysed by the University of San-Diego Trans-Border Institute taken from Agencia Reforma news group. It is a war fought with the help of 45,000 soldiers and 5,000 federal forces in 18 states where trafficking groups are trying to get access to the US market for selling drugs as there is total prohibition on the sale of drugs in the US. There has been recurrent flow of arms to the South while cartel-linked crime has been heading towards North (LAT 2010).
One of the main stakeholders in the drug trafficking, the US, is not recognising the ill-effects of the war between the illicit stakeholders and the active players, namely the Mexican government, the US government and the press waging a collective war against the traffickers. In stead of rebuking Hillary Clinton on her remarks that violence in Mexico has grown to such proportions as total insurgency, the President Obama should pay urgent attention to the happenings by calling a meeting to discuss the repercussions of increasing violence with the members of his national security team and outside experts (Carpenter 2010).
Other actors and stakeholders in the US-Mexican drug problem include the media reporters bravely involved in covering the activities of drug cartels. Drug mafia has waged a counter-war against reporters killing more than 30 journalists since 2006. Working conditions for reporters are not better than they are facing in countries like Iraq, Sudan and Afghanistan. Media has been forced there to play the role of a silent spectator by not prominently covering the activities of drug mafia. The intimidation of the media has crossed the limits to the extent that in one of the editorials El Diario, the main newspaper in Ciudad Juarez, the centre of violence in Mexico’s drug war, has sought advice from traffickers on what to publish and what not after the traffickers killed one of ...
Cite this document
(“Who are the main actors and stakeholders in US-Mexican drug problem Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/412273-who-are-the-main-actors-and-stakeholders-in-us-mexican-drug-problem
(Who Are the Main Actors and Stakeholders in US-Mexican Drug Problem Essay)
“Who Are the Main Actors and Stakeholders in US-Mexican Drug Problem Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/412273-who-are-the-main-actors-and-stakeholders-in-us-mexican-drug-problem.
This drug cartel is one of the largest and most vicious of the cartels currently in existence. The goal of this paper is to outline a strategy to dismantle and apprehend the chief suspects still at large within the organization itself. In researching this cartel it becomes readily apparent that those who place themselves in opposition to it generally end up dead.
The U.S. is seen as a melting pot of many cultures and races. But Mexican Americans, as well as the other minorities, have suffered from enough poverty and discrimination. Until Americans can learn to work together instead of trying to climb on top of each other, discrimination will continue to exist.
US Economy with Mexican Immigrants
The native unskilled workers are compelled to compete with Mexican immigrants. The adverse effects include notable increase in unemployment rate and unscientific wage structure. Introduction The US economy is the world’s largest national economy.
The economy of Mexico is considered to be relatively free. According to the Library of Congress, because it is intertwined with the economy of the United States especially due to the North America free trade agreement, the country is considered to have a very high potential of developing and benefiting from the agreement.
Stakeholders are individuals, groups or societies who depend on the organisation to fulfil their need and of which the organisation depends on to survive (Johnson & Scholes 2007). However, the notion of stakeholders was viewed differently by Pesqueux and Damak-Ayadi (2005).
That is "Are we doing the right thing" or "Is there something else which can be done" In the end what's done will be done by those involved, but it is crucial to take an account of more than just one opinion in trying to figure out the best course of action.
New actors and relationships were introduced; older actors and relationships were redefined. U.S. President George H. W. Bush (1991) spoke of a ‘new world order’. The United Nations (UN, 1994) introduced the concept of Human
After this point this paper will discuss the reasons why the group uses violence; and building on this previous point consider if the use of violence can and cannot be considered terrorism. Lastly this paper will discuss globalization and the