Thought on the Part of Karl Marx - Essay Example

Marx’s Approaches to History and Perceptions of Thought Introduction Karl Marx happens to be the enunciator of Das Capital that is nothing but a treatise on modern communism. The capability as an intellectual that he was endowed with and contributed a new direction to the emergence of philosophy of socialism was widely criticized and in spite of withstanding with such criticism stood the times in proven scientific socialism. He also informed that a class struggle would be created and intellectual development is called for putting an end for ongoing imbroglio. The pivotal role create by the perceptions of thought on the part of Karl Marx manifesting economic, political as well as social thought that should be adequately emphasized in perfunctory words. Economic systems from the social point of view have been specified in varieties of mannerisms are transient as well as driving a strata of society that empowers phenomena for satisfaction of history. The views of Karl Marx are manifested in two methodologies and ways. As a methodology of interpretation as well as another in terms of doctrine that would provide guidance for practice in the political arena. There is a plethora of crisp characterisations that transforms into materialism of history blended with scientific socialism utilised primarily by Engels (1907) that embraces terms, an embodiment materialism utilised by Plekhanov (2008) as well as the interpretation of historical facts initially utilised by Bernstein. An opinion is extended to the effect that they do not satisfy the crux of the matter (Evans, 1975). Elements of Marx’s Approach to History At the outset Marx’s research is analytical about the assessment of alienating the product that is a part of division of labour based on capitalism. The next aspect manifests a comparison with a favourable economic as well as unfavourable observation that is sociological on division of labour made by the father of economics, Adam Smith. The third aspect the West, 1969 offers general criticisms about alienation that emerges from the standpoint of economics based on politics. L.D. Easton’s 1970 view on empiricism and alienation that analyses the thought of Marx as not standing the acid test of unique interpretation of Karl Marx’s views pertaining to explosion of knowledge for examining in brevity various statements that govern the development commencing from the angle and nomenclature of alienation in previous years’ writings. Easton’s aim was to bring about an assertion with hypotheses as well as ambiguities on empiricism as compared to rationalism. A.F. McGovern views on Marx were that he attempted the process of tracing the development of various political ideas between 1840 and 1845 indicating the paradigm shift in various meanings for bringing about changes in thoughts that would create a shift of meaning of state as well. He further argues that Karl Marx’s earlier career emanated from rational state meaning thereby a unified society that is organic covering all spheres surrounding a man. The universal life and its remnants of norm on criticisms of society of civil lives creating a political state in his recent works were noted. The base of criticism of Hegel’s philosophy on the aspects of state, the realisation of Karl Marx were to the effect that political state that claimed fulfilment of ideals of a community as fundamental realism constituted specific sphere of bringing about a society above board distinctive of the same. An analysis also is indicative from various angles that would cover independence of state prior to a combined Germany where domination was not prevalent. Universality of society could not be achieved as well as a later criticism on dependent state for instance England that serves bourgeois class that is predominantly an instrument of guarantee as well as oppression of systems based on capitalism. The treatise of Karl Marx on Human Nature the transformation of capitalists’ society was primarily concentrated upon and it did not cover the aspects of anthropology or philosophy based on human beings. Nonetheless, in Marx’s writings as well as considering his works of maturity he indicated that his treatise was considered to be distinctive from the findings of Hegel as well as Feuerbach although it is a blend of elements of writings of both of them. Karl Marx dealt with the nature of man effectively and came out with his findings effectively on the transformation of society to reach the capitalistic condition that created economic activities enabling earnings. (Marx, 1988). The treatise of Karl Marx was a class apart and in the view of J.E. Elliott’s on alienation as well as economic systems stipulates an evaluation of criticism on arguments level by Roberts Stephenson. The paper quadruples encompassing four issues that are enumerated as the role of exploitation of importance, the uniqueness of the concept of alienation relating to capitalism, alienation sources, and a means of supersession of alienation in the sphere of socialism. E.K.Hunt also develops the theory by covering more aspects of factors of production such as land, labour, capital including money. This is essential for the development of understanding of their utilisation for generating higher revenues based on the nature of industry with which an individual is associated. (Amsterdam, 1977). Scientific Socialism of Karl Marx The exponents of scientific socialism theory also gave birth to Karl Marx for ensuring scientific socialism through the medium of criticism of capitalistic elements of production and creation of economic activities in the process. Part I of the treatise touches upon money and commodities that is expressed as a useful product concerning for labour from societal standpoint. The commodities value would create the quantum of extent of social labour involved in production. The time spent on production and involved through the medium of labour needs to be remunerated and hence, a categorical scientific reasoning is in favour of the extent of emergence of scientific socialism as a matter of justification for the treatise of Karl Marx’s Das capital. This argument and interpretation happens to be an evidence of scientific explanation of the theory of Karl Marx. Part II deals with exchange and further evidences the payment to all people involved in production or for commodities. This also happens to be a substantiating point of scientific theory of Karl Marx that is relevant from the angle of socio-economic scenario. Part III deals on commodities’ circulation for realisation of utility value by payment of a certain amount of money. Hence, this approach is called scientific (Morris, 2009). Role in Individuals vis-à-vis Social Forces The role of individuals are emancipated with reference to their contacts, efforts, as well as their capabilities to generate a certain level of activity based on giving benefit to the social cause as well. Various social forces such as political, society, expectations of society, capability of society to withstand a certain level of compensation for generation of economic activity that may be average or a degree superior for ensuring a positive approach based on sources of inspiration of earnings of contemporaries at the same level. The contact may also involve with a particular class or capacity of individuals who can guide for better compensation in the existing activity or in relation to a new activity that may be more compensating. The relationship between role of individuals and social forces should be balanced and an appropriate direction is sought for the furtherance of compensation of economic activities produced in the long run. The improvement of mind and intellect as well as its development would also ensure further prospects commensurate with the growth of economic development for a long term perspective. The generation for an understanding for achievement that is substantiated by the theories of economics should be understood and efforts should be made by individuals for success in the long run (Blackledge, 2006). Conclusion The theory of Karl Marx satisfies all the lucid tests of various approaches to the extent that it is necessary in earlier times for generation of economic activity and compensation. The role of individuals and their relation to social forces as well as scientific propounding of the theory has been palatable and it is relevant for reference even in the present days for awakening the minds of many avid readers. This is for understanding the principles of economics and its relevance in the society for creating more and more earning prospects for growth and development. Various exponents have developed their schools of thought on the aspect of scientific approaches balancing social forces for the development of communism as well as capitalism. In the present day scenario extreme form of communism is harmful and hence, some countries follow capitalists’ economy concepts and some mixed. The economic concept would also further developed scientifically based on further revelations from exponents and top luminaries including latest noble prize experts. The fundaments of economics dwells upon generation of economic activities and production of commodities that can be valued and compensated for payments to labour as well as management. The fundamentals further are utilised with the bases of choice necessitating more players in the industry to come out with new concepts and commodities and generate employment and sources of lively hood. It should be understood that all these are offshoots of the fundamentals of economic theories for the purposes of earnings and creation of economic activities. Work Cited Marx, Karl. Karl Marxs economics. Vol. 1. New York: Croom Helm Ltd, 1988. p. 17-23. Print Evans, Michael. Karl Marx. New York: Routledge, 1975. p. 79 Print West, E G. The Political Economy of Alienation: Karl Marx and Adam Smith. Vol. 21. Oxford Economic Papers, 1969. pp. 1-23. Print Engels, Friedrich. Landmarks of Scientific Socialism: Anti-Duehring. New York: Cosimo Classics, 1907. Print Plekhanov, G V. The Materialist Conception of History. Wildside Press LLC, 2008. Print Bernstein, Evolutionary socialism: a criticism and affirmation. Husbsch, 1911. pp. 224. Gruner Amsterdam, B R. Marxism, revolution, and peace. Hungar: Howard L. Parsons & John Somerville, 1977. p. 185. Print Elliott, J E. Professor Robert’s Marx: On Alienation and Economic System. Vol. 9. N.p.: Journal of Economic Issues, 1975. pp. 471-500. Print William Morris, Socialism: Its Growth and Outcome. 2009. p. 175. Blackledge, Paul. Reflections on the Marxist theory of history. New York: Manchester University Press, 2006. p. 61. Print Read More