Public Defense System in the USA - Essay Example

An overburdened public defense system results in wrongful convictions because a public defender has very many cases to handle and lacks ample time to spend on each case, and this affects the quality of representation (Collica & Furst, 2012). In the long rand, there is wrongful conviction because the Public defender does not comprehensively analyze the case. There is also poor contact between the public defender, and there is unfair conviction.

            In contrast, the level of representation illustrated by Bright to the level of representation of white collar, corporate, and environmental crimes is to say that money has power and influence. A plaintiff without money to hire a competitive Public defender receives poor representation in the court of law, and the case does not favor him/her (Collica & Furst, 2012).

            In solving these issues, every state should adequately fund the public defender system because everyone should get a fair and justified trial. It becomes difficult to receive a fair trial if the representation is poor. Adequate resourcing and funding of the public defender program results in a fair trial and effective representation.

Discussion 2 -The War on Drugs

            The war on drugs has resulted in increased imprisonment.  There has been heavy taxation to imprison and rehabilitate drug victims.  According to Collins (2012), since the commencement of the war on Drugs, there has been a great increase in those convicted.   There has been an unequal percentage of minority groups convicted and imprisoned without proper investigation.

            In the year 2003, there was a high rate of imprisonment of African Americans accused of drug abuse in the US (Collica, 2012).  However, the use and trafficking of illegal drugs among white and African Americans are equal, yet African Americans are the ones accused and imprisoned.  This is unfair and against the constitutional rights of discrimination based on race and color (Collica, 2012).

            The increase of immigrants in the US has reduced crime rates. Indeed, immigration has a positive contribution to the US economy. As the number of immigrants increases, there is family stability because of the social and practical assistance that the two families engage in, and in the long rand, this decreases the chances of crime rates.  With time, people shun away from engaging in criminal behaviors and instead involve themselves in developmental projects to support each other (Collica, 2012).

            The War on Drugs is a battle that will last forever. People will always engage in using and trafficking drugs. Imprisonment does not control the behavior, and the only way to end this problem is by amending American policies on drugs.  In addition, legalizing some drugs may also curb the calamity and reduce the hefty taxation. Together with that, the government may also earn income from selling some of the drugs. However, this does not mean that legalizing drugs is the best way to control criminal behavior, but it may help regulate social behaviors.