Texas Government - Essay Example

Texas Government Texas Government Texas The Texas Constitution is the foundation of the s government and provides the basic or fundamental law of the state (Kilman & Costello, 2000). The separation of powers splits power among diverse government arms. This principle assists in preventing any one arm from becoming too authoritative (Texas Constitution and Statutes, 2014). Under Article II of this state’s Constitution, the powers of the Texas State government are split into three distinct arms, each of which are confided to a distinct body of magistracy; to wit: Those that are executive to one, those that are legislative to another, as well as those that are judicial to another; and no individual, or group of individuals, being a member one of these arms, can exercise any power appropriately connected to either of the others, except for the instances that are expressly permitted under their law (Texas Constitution and Statutes, 2014).

This structure resembles the U.S.’s government i.e. legislative, judicial and executive. Each branch has different roles and powers. The legislative arm formulates the laws. The executive arm, on the other hand, enforces or carries the laws and the judicial arm, also known as the court system, decides on legal matters and also interprets the laws (Texas Constitution and Statutes, 2014). To balance power further, the Texas Constitution incorporates a system of checks and balances in which each arm has methods of checking, or restraining, the other two.

These checks assist in preventing one branch from managing the entire government own its own. This is similar to the one of the U.S. Constitution (Texas Constitution and Statutes, 2014).U.S. Federal GovernmentUnder Article 1 of the U.S. Constitution, Section I offers Congress just those legislative powers herein contracted and goes on to list those acceptable actions under Section 8 of the same, whereas Section 9 explains actions, which are forbidden for the Congress (Kilman & Costello, 2000).

The vesting section in Article II places no restrictions on the Executive branch, only stating that the executive command will be vested in a leader of the U.S. According to Article III, the Supreme Court, on the other hand, holds the judicial Power, and it developed the implication of judicial review in Madison v. Marbury under the U.S. Marshall court (Kilman & Costello, 2000). The federal regime refers to the arms as branches of government, whereas the Texas system uses the word "government" to refer to the executive branch (Kilman & Costello, 2000). The U.S.

executive arm has tried to claim control arguing for separation of powers to incorporate being the Chief in Command of an army after the famous American Civil War, emergency powers, executive orders and security classifications after World War II, signing statements, national security, as well as the extent of the unitary executive (Kilman & Costello, 2000).The legislative arm writes and passes laws. It also authorises borrowing, enacts taxes, and sets the country’s budget (Kilman & Costello, 2000).

The legislative branch of the United States also has sole power to declare war against another nation. The executive, on the other hand, might veto laws and wages war at the ruling of the Congress. This is because the Congress makes sets the directions rules for the military (Kilman & Costello, 2000). Finally, the judiciary determines the laws Congress that can be applied to any given case. It also decided whether or not a law is unconstitutional.ReferencesKilman, J. H., & Costello, G. (2000).

The constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and interpretation. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Texas Constitution and Statutes. (2014). Texas constitution. Retrieved from http://www.constitution.legis.state.tx.us/