Nafta - hinderance or catalyst - Essay Example

omises particularly because it has undermined the influence of states on public policy while promoting development models that enhance decentralized capitalism (Sieppert & Rowe 22). Consequently, this paper proposes that NAFTA has been a hindrance to Canada and should be replaced by a more equitable agreement for all the three states, or an international agreement that will enhance the general well-being and health of Canadian citizens regardless of geopolitical pressures in the region. This article provides an international analysis of NAFTA’s diverse effects in all the three member countries; the writers propose that the agreement has altered not only the economic, but also the social outcomes in each of the countries, Mexico, the United States, and Canada.

Similarly, the paper addresses the major social justice effects of NAFTA, including issues of labour and migration, the implications for income distribution, outcomes touching on agriculture and the environment, as well as the implications for the health of citizens and health services in all the three countries (Sieppert & Rowe 6). Generally, the article regards these issues within the broader context of globalization but makes a set of recommendations from a social work perspective. This article is essential for this present assessment of the negative implications of NAFTA on the three countries, and Canada in particular because it shades light on the numerous shortfalls of the agreement, besides explaining its foundations.

Initially, the article highlights the origins of NAFTA, in the negotiations between the leaders of the three states, Prime Minister Brian Mulroney of Canada, President Carlos Salinas de Gortari of Mexico, and President George Bush of the U.S.A, which later led to its implementation in 1994. The article further outlines the initial intentions of NAFTA as liberalization of trade between the three countries while promoting economic cooperation as well as enhancement of investment