You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
"The Mozart Effect" Annotated Bibliography
Pages 10 (2510 words)
Annotated Bibliography Table of Contents I. Annotated Bibliography 3 II. Critical Evaluation of the Bibliography 13 I. Annotated Bibliography Applasamy, A. 2012. Bang Goes the Theory: The Mozart’s Effect. YouTube. [Online]. Available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?
The video also employed the talents of a researcher and annotator who did live recreations of versions of the tests, where subjects chosen at random in a public place were subjected to Mozart music and to music from Blur and then made to undergo the battery of cognitive tests that included solving puzzles, testing reaction times to falling rulers, and tests of memory, among others The findings in the public tests were in congruence with the findings in other studies that state that there is nothing in Mozart music that is special, even though Mozart music did indeed boost subject performance in cognitive tests. This is the conclusion because music by Blur also had the same effect. The baseline was silence. In both cases where subjects were first subjected to silence and then to either Mozart or Blur music, there were observed improvements in the performance of the subjects to the tests. The final caveat is that the performance boosts occurred after listening to the music, and that the performance boosts were short-lived. The video in all is a good general overview of the nature of the Mozart effect tests and the kinds of challenges that have been made to it over the years (Applasamy, 2012). Bangerter, A. and Heath, C. 2004. The Mozart Effect: Tracking the evolution of a scientific legend. British Journal of Social Psychology (2004). [Online]. ...
Not exactly what you need?