POW's: Should the US use Torture and Enhanced Interrogation Techniques in its War on Terrorism? Outline 1.0 Introduction- a brief note on the topic which describes the use of enhanced interrogation techniques on warfare. 2.0 Definition of the term torture and the need of harsh interrogation techniques 3.0 Increasing terrorist attacks and security problems require effective strategies 4.0 Evidences that justify the use of various interrogation techniques 5.0 Criticism against the use of interrogation techniques and its organized use 6.0 Conclusion- a shot note which wind up relevant ideas that are discussed in the body of the paper…
It is difficult to define the word ‘torture’. The Bush administration announced that the use of these techniques is subjected to the situation and special care will be taken to avoid the possibility of abuse. The event of September 11 and related issues has raised serious questions regarding the national security and economic stability of the nation. Therefore, implementation of various interrogation strategies is essential to maintain national security and to win the war on terrorism. Even though critics oppose the use of enhanced interrogation techniques on terrorists, maintaining the security of common people and their lives calls for the need to have such interrogations. Organized use of enhanced interrogation techniques is essential and the U.S government should use it to prevent the threat of terrorism. Introduction Terrorism and related issues pose great threat to international peace and security today. Highly organized and broad-shouldered approaches like enhanced interrogation techniques are essential for a nation to do away with terrorist attacks. Debates about the use of enhanced interrogation techniques and strategies make the topic in to a controversial issue. Torture and enhanced interrogation techniques were widely implemented by George W. Bush administration in the United States for US military intelligence and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to take out information from persons and organizations in its War on Terrorism. Implementation of these war strategies paved the way for relevant discussions and debates among the media as well the international community. Should the US use Torture and Enhanced Interrogation Techniques in its War on Terrorism is a solid question for one to probe into. After the event of September 11, the U.S administration was forced to seek effective methods and strategies to put off the threat of global terrorism. However, authorities who advocate the use of harsh interrogation techniques never encourage severe tortures. In the age of increasing threat of global terrorism, the U.S government cannot give up its responsibility to save the lives of its civilians and prevent the harmful effects of global terrorism. The use of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and efficient communication strategies increases the need of new strategies to tackle terrorism. Even though, critics and social activists argue against the use of torture and enhanced interrogation strategies and consider them as violations of the decisions at the Geneva Convention, one can never undermine the effectiveness of employing torture and enhanced interrogation techniques in the war on terrorism. The call for and possibility of the use of various enhanced interrogation techniques is a composite question because the existing political circumstance force one to think about the positive and negative effects of torture. The CIA investigators and officials were trained in various torture and enhanced interrogation methods such as water boarding, the attention grab, attention slap, belly slap, the cold sell and long time standing for suspects. One can describe these interrogation tec ...
Cite this document
(“POW's: Should the US use Torture and Enhanced Interrogation Techniques Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/nursing/39089-pow-s-should-the-us-use-torture-and-enhanced
(POW'S: Should the US Use Torture and Enhanced Interrogation Techniques Research Paper)
“POW'S: Should the US Use Torture and Enhanced Interrogation Techniques Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/nursing/39089-pow-s-should-the-us-use-torture-and-enhanced.
This assignment focuses on Khalid Sheikh Mohammed one of the masterminds of the 9/11 attacks and trials held in Military Tribunals and federal courts. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was born on April 24, 1965 in Kuwait. He is the uncle of terrorism suspect Ramzi Yousef who was involved in the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993.
Being an asymmetric manner of use of force, it involves coercive power with all the benefits of military force given at a meager cost. Terrorist groups are of secretive nature and of relatively low strength. This makes it difficult for their opponents to defend them.
The practice included using prisoners to force them to take an herbal plant concoction to test whether it is poisonous or not. There were no medical ethics back then and it was considered to be more important in the wider search for knowledge to sacrifice just one life in order to gain something.
While human civilization has much progressed in many areas, this tendency has held humanity back. The practice of torture is not merely repulsive to the senses. Beyond the obvious pain and suffering inflicted on the victim, it poses several ethical questions to the practitioner.
Prisoner Torture. Investigation of any crime or unlawful activity is a precursor to bring the guilty to the rule of law and deliver justice. Therefore, investigation plays a crucial role in detecting and deterring crimes and other unlawful activities from the society.
The subjects of interrogation techniques are mostly the witnesses, victims or suspects. There are numerous interrogation techniques, which include deception, waterboarding, torture, and Reid technique among others. In the United States, the US personnel have used numerous interrogation techniques, some of which have been approved by the US government.
Law enforcement agencies commonly use torture during interrogation of suspects and criminals so as to obtain particular information from them. The debate on whether to use torture during interrogation is complex as it touches on morality and human rights.
Those in the favor of heavy military spending state that when military spending increases, the government’s demand for goods and services increases. When demand for goods and services increase, employment within the nation even increases and due to spending conducted by military officials in order to obtain goods and services, further jobs are created.