This unfair situation should be remedied by immediately establishing steps towards the payment of the football players. Unfortunately, there is strong opposition against such effort, primarily from the school administrators themselves. Nevertheless, it must be made clear that the payment of the players’ services is not just because they are making their schools famous. Even without monetary compensation, these players would certainly work hard to win championships because of their loyalty to the schools where they belong. Still, they deserve to be paid because the schools are actually earning from them also, not just for indirect promotions, but for actually taking part in a revenue-generating spectator sport. The NCAA, particularly its football tournaments, has become a big business, which is why the players should get what is due to them for their hard work. Should College Football Players be Paid? College football players contribute so much in promoting their respective schools. They certainly do not only make the colleges and universities in which they are enrolled in proud; they also encourage other prospective students to entertain studying it too. As a result, these athletes may well be considered as the schools’ instruments for increasing the number of enrollees per school year or semester. Since these academic institutions also function as businesses, earning income through tuition, increased enrollment naturally means more revenues to be collected. In a way, college football players should be provided with a percentage of the income they generated for the school. They should be paid not for making their school proud but for utilizing their skills in order to make it earn. The sentiment in favor of having college football players paid by the school is actually gaining support from different sectors already. This is particularly because the public is already very much aware that the NCAA is already a multi-million dollar business. A report from USA Today points out that the “NCAA averages better than half a billion dollars a year in revenue” and that does not include payouts from the 28 football bowls, which exceed $184 million and go to the conferences” (Whiteside 2004). This means that aside from the indirect financial advantages that schools can generate from enrollment, these could also profit from the premier collegiate tournament itself, especially because the games are often televised and just like the professional leagues, also earn from the TV endorsements. These millions of dollars definitely are not gained because of the member-schools of the NCAA doubled or tripled their respective enrollment rates. Instead these are generated because the student athletes trained hard in order to perform well in the games. Their diligence in the training programs in which they all underwent ultimately raised the level of quality of the games, particularly football. In fact, many observers would point out that many college football players already possess the skills commonly seen among the pros. Another argument why school administrators can certainly allocate funds for paying their respective football players is that some coaches in Division 1-A actually make more that $1 million dollars a year. In the Southeastern Conference or SEC, where the some of the country’s top college football teams are found, “
Abstract For many years, college football players have been contributing much to the reputation of the school and for this, they have been aptly provided with scholarships by their respective schools. However, in these recent times, college football is no longer just a spectator sport avidly watched by students of contending universities…
This study gave an insight into the ethical notions existing between athletes and colleges, and it gave many evidences, which proved that idea of paying to college athletes is correct because its advantages are more for every individual of the society. It reflects the notion of equality, human rights, value of hard work and most importantly significance of justice in the society.
Some argue that college athletes are paid by virtue of their scholarship and that is sufficient reimbursement for their services. Putting aside for the moment that these athletes that participate in the more popular sports earn millions of dollars for the university and that other students reap these benefits as well, athletes are denied the same lack of restrictions to earn while they learn and as a result should be somewhat compensated.
The National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA), however, does not allow college athletes to get paid, because they are defined as “amateurs.” This paper argues that it is not fair for collegiate athletes to not be paid, when other parties economically benefit from intercollegiate sports.
Those noted in this context of high transfer fee are the likes of Christiano Ronaldo and Leonel Messi, among others. One may get an interest of the need to evaluate the relationship between a player’s performance in soccer and his market value, which is mostly noted during the transfer windows (Edward, 2006, P.121).
Accordnig to the report college athletics began as a form of exercise and competition for colleges. It was like any other school event. Students used to hold internal or inter college athletics competitions. Most of these formalities have changed and business has entered into college athletics. Most of college athletics have attracted advertisers and promoters.
Controlling how football clubs spend money and dish out their spoils remains the sole responsibility of UEFA. This is because there is a need to create a sense of fair play between the different football clubs who could have varied financial muscle. Without a regulatory body looking into the spending habits on transfer fees and wages, most of the relatively small clubs would find it difficult to compete with the big boys.
The debate as to whether college athletes should be paid or not is one that has elicited mixed reactions from the students, universities and the public as there are those who feel that these young sports persons need to be paid for their talents.
Of course, the players of these sports are all college students themselves, generally playing on a sports scholarship, or playing as regular students. The sports are a side activity taken up by students to have something to relax from the study
College athletics have long been in existence. Kissinger and Miller observe that since 1800s, campuses in the US have been involved in athletics competition (1). Modern day college athletics seek to bring together intellectual aspect of college with a
Recently, the subject of paying college athletes has hit headlines, making a buzz in the field of sports and the society in general. Many people are bothered if there is a need to alter the norm of not giving and allowing
5 pages (1250 words)Research Paper
Get a custom paper written by a pro under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Didn't find an essay?
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org