2004). Title The title of the study conducted by Nick Sevdalis, Andrew N. Healey and Charles A. Vincent (Nick et al. 2006) is well defined, concise and the reader can effectively understand the topic of this study only by reading the title. The title is informative because it is telling us that the subject of this study is which is important information for future researchers (Polit and Beck 2008). However even though I can clearly understand the subject of this study I can understand very little about the character of this study and the methods they used so based on the title I can’t determine if it is a systematic review, experimental study. Researchers Qualifications Nick et al. 2006 have the appropriate professional qualifications for conduction of this study. This is important because of the character of the research method adopted by the authors. Subject of this study is analysis of communication within the operating room and identification of eventual events that may distract the normal functioning of the surgeon, anesthesiologist or other members present in the operating room. In order to achieve adequate and reliable assessment there is a need of professionals, trained to recognize the subtitle communications within the operation room. They have to be familiar with medical terminology and the surgical procedure in general in order to be able to recognize and differentiate a conversation that may be qualified as distraction or communication that is normal and productive (Dale 2005). As I can see from the qualifications of the researchers (Lecturer in patient safety, Research associate, Professor of clinical safety research - Department of bio-surgery) all of these aspects are covered. Abstract Abstract is a brief summary of an experimental study, research paper, dissertation thesis or some other academic article. It can be viewed as a “point of entry” or general information’s about the paper (Gliner et al. 2000). It is often used as a tool for fast familiarization with the general text. Abstracts are often used by researchers in order to obtain fast information about the essence of the study and to conclude if this study is of any interest for his research. Study conducted by Nick et al. 2006 has abstract included at the beginning of the text. In the abstract authors state the aim of the study: there are problems of communications effectiveness in the operating rooms and authors try to identify the content, initiators and recipients of communications and the level at which the surgical team and its team members are distracted by these case-irrelevant communications or CIC’s. In the abstract I can also see that authors presented a short outline of the methodology that they used in order to obtain the data. At the end of the abstract authors summarize the findings in a conclusion subheading where they point their perspective of the findings of the study and proposal for a future research. As I can see abstract of this study is very informative and concise. Introduction Introduction of the study
Critique of a published research paper Study type In this review I will analyze a randomized experimental, mixed design (quantitative and qualitative) study conducted in clinical settings (Shadish et al 2002). It is experimental study because it tries to test a hypothesis on a randomized cohort group of surgeons, anesthesiologists and other staff in the operational room, in clinical settings in one hospital…
About the Author Shelley completed his Ph.D. from the City University of New York, in the year 2003 in Cognitive Neuroscience. At the time of writing this article, Shelly was studying BS at Colorado State University, with majors in Psychology. He has associations to a number of psychological research institutions and has a number of papers written and published related to psychology and neurology.
As the occupation of nurses is different from health care providers, therefore, they have a different scope of doing work and have a different mode for practice. Nurses have wide diverse areas of their practice with a different scope and different level of prescriber authority in each of the departments or areas.
Thus, as apparent in the above explanation, research, by intent, is supposed to create knowledge in the relevant fields, to develop, refine and expand the horizon of knowledge in such a chosen field. Although specialised procedures vary from one field of inquiry to another, common ideas shared by the various fields of study is, first and foremost, the conviction that the process must be objective so that the researcher does not bias the interpretation of the results or change the results outright.
sis will obviously be useful in understanding one’s ability in catching the nerve of research materials, analysing the various factors of the paper etc. In this critique, an analysis of the paper ‘A home visiting project for reception children predicted to experience
She needs to be critical about these researches. This paper critiques two nursing researches on cancer. One is a qualitative research entitled, “Living with Incurable Cancer at the End of Life-Patients’ Perceptions on Quality of Life; and
The pathogen was identified and described by Kapikian and associates in 1972; however lack of appropriate detection protocols prevented their significance till much later (Koo et al., 1673). Five genera are included in the Caliciviridae family; Norovirus (NoV), Sapovirus (SoV),
and Pringle, A. 2014. ‘Motivate’: The effect of a Football in the Community delivered weight loss programme on over 35-year old men and women’s cardiovascular risk factors. Soccer & Society. 15(6): 951-956.
The aim of the research was clearly laid out
3 pages (750 words)Essay
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you an essay for FREE
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org