You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Critical Appraisal of a Clinical Guideline
Pages 6 (1506 words)
Critique Introduction The practice of conducting academic research has almost come to stay and would therefore continue year in and out. However, conducting academic research is characterized with following specific and laid down rules and outlines. To this effect, critique of research reports remains an important practice in academic cycles.
It is against this backdrop that this essay is seeking to critically review and appraise the research undertaken by Chan, Lopel And Chung. Research Design The aim of the research was stated as “to investigate the perceptions of coronary heart disease among a sample of Hong Kong Chinese people.” Qualitative study was conducted using focus group interviews. To a very large extent, qualitative research has been endorsed as a very appropriate research methodology for social rather than scientific researches. Since this research was set out to find the perceptions of people about a health related issue, it could be concluded that this is a social research. To this effect, it is right the qualitative research was used. Ereaut (2011) notes that “Qualitative research seeks out the ‘why’, not the ‘how’ of its topic through the analysis of unstructured information – things like interview transcripts.” This also means that the choice of interview as a research design was appropriate since the research method was a qualitative research method. These two points not withstanding, in relating the research design, which was group interview to the aim of the research, it could be said that the researchers could have resorted to one-on-one interview instead of group interview. ...
Not exactly what you need?