This paper attempts to critique a research article titled: ‘First generation Korean American parents’ perceptions of discipline’ by Kim and Hong (2007). The research article, cited in Journal of Professional Nursing (23:1), describes an exploratory study conducted to have…
The main aim of this research was to study the Korean-American parent’s perceptions regarding common discipline strategies in the United States of America while the secondary aim was to explore the specific discipline strategies used by the Korean American parents. The study therefore aimed at yielding some useful data regarding the differential discipline related strategies used by Korean American parents; to assist the individuals in healthcare sector, especially nurses in providing effective assistance and guidance to Korean American parents regarding discipline training of their children.
According to Ariola (2006), a complete research paper must state the rationale of the study, a justification that the research was needed. In case of this study, the author has justified the need as follows: Korean Americans are the third largest minority living in the United States and the author states that little is known about the Korean culture and family life. This poses a problem for the nurses and health care professionals while evaluating and giving advice regarding disciplining the children. Kim and Hong (2007) claim that the nurses therefore need to be better acquainted with the Korean culture and common Korean American discipline strategies to be in a better position to guide the Korean American parents.
The authors of the study being reviewed are Eunjung Kim and Seunghye Hong. Kim is an associate professor in the ‘family and child nursing department’, University of Washington, WA; while Hong is a doctoral student in the school of social work at the same university. According to Smith and Lytle (1990), teachers play an important role in research. Teachers should be encouraged to conduct research since this ensures their professional development. Kim therefore is a very suitable candidate for research. The other researcher, namely Hong is a doctoral student in social work. Nursing and social work are very closely linked to each other ...
Cite this document
(“Qualitative Critique Book Report/Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 1”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/nursing/453736-qualitative-critique
(Qualitative Critique Book Report/Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words - 1)
“Qualitative Critique Book Report/Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/nursing/453736-qualitative-critique.
The research article, cited in Journal of Professional Nursing (23:1), describes an exploratory study conducted to have a deeper understanding of perceptions and use of American versus Korean discipline strategies used by Korean American parents. This critique is intended to evaluate the study, highlighting its strengths and weaknesses.
The title ‘The Path to Self-Management: Qualitative Study Involving Older People with Multiple Sclerosis’ describes the study clearly and concisely. The title indicates that the study is qualitative in nature, with the topic being the path to self-management.
More than anything else, qualitative research allows the researcher to explore the possible paths s/he might take in the course of research. While quantitative research provides a predetermined path to analysis and interpretation, qualitative research is mainly exploratory and the researcher, at every stage of the study, undergoes unexpected discoveries and realizations about the topic at hand.
The purpose of critiquing a research report is to examine its various components and opine upon the ethics, research methods, data quality, and other aspects of the information presented. I have chosen the nursing industry standard for critique as the method for presenting the information contained herein.
Struggling with the same issues of direction and context this article, "Dynamics of decision power in the localization process: comparative case studies of China-Western IJV's" reviews the International Human Resources Management issues and how they have impacted on the transfer of HRM facilities by Multinational Corporations .The emphasis is on whether normative host country practices can be internationalised particularly with regard to International Joint Ventures in relation to examples from the experience of four Chinese International Joint Ventures.
References and in-text citations were evidence of experience in nursing, gerontology and research, especially the lead researcher, Suzuki.
b) Title: The main purpose was stated, though 'functional disabilities' or gender differences were not in it, and the term "relationship between" was.
Yin's (1994) definition is employed as the basic one: "[case study is] an empirical enquiry that investigates a contemporary phenomenon within its real-life context, especially when the boundaries between phenomenon and context are not clearly evident' and it relies on multiple sources of evidence" (p.13).
The primary finding in this area as etched out by C. Winter, M. Lockwood and Morrison in their paper titled Value Based Segmentation of Community Stakeholders, demonstrates the fact that without the support of well defined partnerships, the government alone cannot do much.
The case analysis of Chris and his therapist helps in showing importance of patients acceptance of class advantages. White middle-class privileges should be comprehended and noted during therapy since their realization is prone to improve the effectiveness of
study is to examine the impact of a Houses of Healing program on the psychosocial (anxiety, depression, self-esteem) and spiritual well-being of grieving incarcerated women. The author is attempting to answer questions related to the aspect of why incarcerated women are often
2 Pages(500 words)Book Report/Review
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Book Report/Review on topic Qualitative Critique for FREE!