The governments world over are making concerted efforts to improve health outcomes. Private sectors, non-government organizations are deployed to harness the available resources to provide effective and efficient healthcare services. The basic objective of WHO framework (2007) is to strengthen healthcare systems throughout the world so that general health standards of the people can get improved…
The basic objective of WHO framework (2007) is to strengthen healthcare systems throughout the world so that general health standards of the people can get improved. The paper will study the healthcare system of U.K. keeping in view the basic guidelines as provided in WHO framework and assess its strengths and weaknesses. The paper will also look into the healthcare system of Canada so as to have some comparative viewpoint regarding healthcare services as operating in these two countries. WHO Framework (2007) and Building Blocks There are six building blocks of any health system as prescribed by World Health organisation for an excellent healthcare system in any country. (World Health… 2007) 1. Good Health Services That means safe, effective, and quality health services to all those who need them while making optimum use of resources. 2. An Efficient Health Workforce It is an important building block that should perform well to achieve the best health outcomes. They are competent, responsive, and productive to carry out the health functions. There should be sufficient healthcare professionals spread across all the geography. ...
t and Leadership Governance and Leadership works towards strategic policy frameworks with proper regulation and effective oversight coupled with proper accountability. Judging UK Healthcare Services from above Criteria U.K.’s National Health System follows (NHS) the Beveridge Model of healthcare to provide healthcare services to its citizens. The NHS is a government-run institution that takes care of all its citizens and provides them doctors, clinics and hospitals. Since citizens do not pay any bills, it does not put any undue financial burden on the citizens including the treatment taken for any critical illness. In this system, the patients are always at ease for they get healthcare services through government funding and they need not spend anything from their own pockets. The advantage of the model is that each and every citizen gets medical treatment free of charge regardless of their economic status and kind of illness. Patients need not pay hefty insurance premiums for the various health issue coverage as found in the countries like U.S.; however, the UK government does charge 17 percent sales tax to cover up healthcare expenses for its countrymen. The disadvantage with the Beveridge model is that it does not provide any motivation to the physician for they cannot charge (Hamilton 2009). U.K being a developed country is good on availability of vaccines, medical products and in health related technologies. Vaccines are usually available as and when need arises in all parts of the country. Certain shortages of branded drugs in U.K has been attributed to European Union trade laws, under which medicines from UK cannot be prevented from export to other countries of Europe. The Department of Health in its last meeting with manufacturers and suppliers has taken ...
Cite this document
(“WHO Framework and Healthcare System of U.K Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/nursing/51380-using-the-who-frame-work
(WHO Framework and Healthcare System of U.K Essay)
“WHO Framework and Healthcare System of U.K Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/nursing/51380-using-the-who-frame-work.
This research aims to evaluate and present the comparison of the progressivity of incoming tax and corporation tax in the United Kingdom. The discussion will also attempt to address the primary question framed as follows: For income and corporation tax, identify who is responsible for notification of income and payment of tax and when? Has United Kingdom felt the need to respond to competitive pressures and how?
US health care system vs. Canada's health care system
Both USA and Canada spend a considerable amount of their resources on their respective healthcare system. While the healthcare network in USA is operated with the help of both public and private resources, the same in Canada is mainly directed by the Government.
This has in most countries become the driving force behind the adoption of systems that will ensure the population within them manage to meet their medical needs.
Health care systems can be defined as organized arrangements planned to meet needs that will ensure the wellbeing of an intended population.
Laws are essentially made to control the behaviour of the people. If we see this practically, laws are meant to check the evil side of the human mind, which forces people to commit negative things harmful for any society and/or country.
It means that the principles and guidelines of the law which have been set forth in a society are essentially meant to control the behavior, attitude and professional practice of judges.
and Saudi Arabia. U.K. being part of the European Union (EU) also has to balance the health care parameters of the WHO with EU though the latter may not prescribe to undermine WHO’s policy guidelines. The unique
on, then to secondary prevention and early detection in the at-risk population and ends with disease management once disease is established besides management and tertiary prevention for people with complex chronic diseases. Although strategies may vary from region to region,
It is evident that the frequency and the magnitude of adverse patient incidents were not common before the 1990s when many nations reported a large number of incidences caused by medical errors. It is also evident that patient safety is a crucial health care control supported by the developing scientific framework.