An essay "Medical Malpractice: When Can Patients Sue a Hospital for Negligence?" outlines that in most cases, nurses, medical technicians, and paramedics are hospital employees but the same does not necessarily apply to doctors who at times use hospital premises to offer their services…
A paramedic who is employed by a certain hospital gives a patient the wrong injection. In such a case, the hospital will be held liable. What is gross negligence? It occurs when one acts in a manner likely to cause injury to another without regard for the potential victim. There are three elements required to prove gross negligence; the plaintiff needs to prove that the defendant owes him/her a duty of care. Secondly, the plaintiff needs to show that the duty of care owed as breached. Lastly, the claimant must prove that the loss suffered was caused by the defendant. This is the element of causation which is the question under discussion and therefore we shall delve deeper into it. How do you determine causation? You simply carry out the but for test- ask but for the defendant's actions, would the claimant have suffered the loss? If the answer is in the affirmative, then the defendant is not liable. If no, then the defendant is liable. The hospital’s liability will be solely dependant on its employee’s liability simply based on the principle of vicarious liability. Therefore, if any of the three employees namely the physician, nurse or ER tech are found liable, then by default the hospital will also be liable. The ER Tech carried out his duties diligently when he went to the patient’s room to check up on him and even though the nurse casually told him that the patient was probably drunk, he went ahead and made sure that the stretcher was up and then went to help the other nurses. No acts of negligence can be claimed to have been committed. The nurse was negligent because upon realizing that the patient has become restless, anxious and uncooperative, he made an assumption that the patient was drunk and even discouraged the ER tech from giving him too much of his time. ...
Cite this document
(“Medical Malpractice: When Can Patients Sue a Hospital for Negligence Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/nursing/579631-legal-aspects-of-nursing-homework-assignment-1
(Medical Malpractice: When Can Patients Sue a Hospital for Negligence Essay)
“Medical Malpractice: When Can Patients Sue a Hospital for Negligence Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/nursing/579631-legal-aspects-of-nursing-homework-assignment-1.
This paper will discuss the issue related to how pharmaceuticals have gone stray from their focus of preventing from diseases to a money making business. It will also discuss tactics deployed by some companies, such as; creating fear of new diseases, releasing untested drugs, testing their drugs in poorer countries, prescribing medicines meant for adults to children and infants, prescribing medicines to chronic patients which have not been tested for long term usage, imported drugs and many others.
The law of Negligence includes misdiagnosis or the failure to adhere to standard medical practices. Medical professionals may not be held accountable for a pre-existing complaint; however, the worry of a pre-existing complaint may be considered negligence.
Such negligence also occurs by failure to act by practitioners with knowledge of the situations but instead deviate from laid down protocols and procedures without valid reasons, resulting in patients’ injury or death. Medical malpractice is a demonstration of disregard in a medical practitioner’s professional and licensed faculty, illustrated by not adhering to standards of practice and causing harm or death (Leonhardt, 2009).
In addition, the hospital facility had previously implemented a computerized system that could facilitate in the narcotic distribution process in the facility. In this case, every nurse in the health facility has the personal responsibility of documenting the time, details and dosage that has been administered to each patient.
A research was conducted by the efforts of researchers from Harvard and USC in collaboration with The Doctors Company that is marked to be one of the best malpractice insurance companies in the United States. The results of the study revealed the fact that medical practice claims serve to provide stress for the physician as well as the patients and their families.
This is the main point that will be addressed in the present paper as reflected in the chosen case.
The litigation ruling under review pertains to the case of SHEILA WEBB versus TULANE MEDICAL CENTER HOSPITAL AND ABE ANDES, M.D. which underwent a full-blown trial.
Contrary to the will of Benny, Douglas obtains consent from Benny's parents to allow him to remove Benny's gallstone. At the operating room, Douglas removed Benny's gallstone without his personal consent.
According to Bhat (2001), marketplace professionalism is a major factor for the advent of malpractice litigation.
The author states that medical ethics based on religion have a clear sense of fundamental values. In the Christian tradition these include a strong belief that human life is a divine gift which cannot be disposed of by mortals. It is often seen as wrong to interfere with the manifest destiny which has been prepared for man.
Liese before the statutory deadline, we affirm.1
Description: Is it reversible error to permit a jury to decide a case based on an instruction that is neither supported by the evidence, intended by the trial court, nor
Conversely, the latter is more specific in that its meaning encompasses both the status and what is expected of a given caretaker that aligns with professional standards. Studies so far conducted reveal
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Medical Malpractice: When Can Patients Sue a Hospital for Negligence for FREE!