Measurement can be defined as the systematic and replicable process by which events or objects are quantified and classified with reference to a particular dimension. Reliability of a measurement defines the degree to which a measurement can be relied upon to secure consistent…
Validity can be face validity, criterion-related validity, formative validity and sampling validity (Klaus, Boyle and Simon, 13). Reliability and validity are related i.e. closely inter-dependent. Although validity cannot exist without reliability, the latter can exist without validity. Some of the systematic factors that affect both the reliability and validity of measurement include presence of unsystematic events, systematic inconsistency and the change in the event being measured. The unsystematic threats to reliability include subject reliability, situational reliability, observer reliability, instrument reliability and data processing reliability (Klaus, Boyle and Simon, 13). Some of the factors to consider in ensuring reliability and validity include time and money, difference in the measurement expected and reference to a previously validated measure. Some of the measures that can be applied in the improvement of the validity and reliability include ensuring that the goals are vividly defined and put into practice, matching the assessment measures to the set goals and objectives, presenting the tests for review to other interested parties, actively involving all participants in a measurement exercise, and comparing the measure with other measures that are ...
Cite this document
(“Validity Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/nursing/584113-validity
(Validity Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words)
“Validity Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/nursing/584113-validity.
Human services research, like every other research, is based on a set of propositions and concepts. In order to operationally define concepts we need to measure them. The process of measurement begins with the fundamental question “What has to be measured?
The paper is aimed to define and to discuss the concepts of reliability and validity in the research process. These concepts are considered statistically significant in proving data in research to be able to be accepted as scientific truth. Reliability defines the high level of trust on the recorded data thus can be repeated and replicated.
The second realities according to Adler, Ronald, Lawrence, and Russell (41) involve the attachment of first order situations to their actual meaning. Reality may take different dimensions in regard to perception resulting from selection which is the first part of perception.
It measures the extent to which tests or procedures assess the same characteristic, skill or quality. It is a measure of the precision between the observers or of the measuring instruments used in a study. It refers to how well all the test items relate to each other.
In an experiment all the external factors are also to be considered so that a perfect conclusion is derived. For e.g. in a school a scheme is adopted to improve the grades of the students and to check if the scheme is successful or not a test is taken before and after the scheme is implemented.
Validity indicates the level by which a test measures a particular data it is supposed to measure.
Validity and reliability are two important concepts that measures the quality of the results and data gathered in
It thus yields a score with six subscales. A seventh subscale has recently been added in order to get the experience of relatedness. The interest subscale is viewed as a measure of self report for intrinsic
e selected group or sample, external validity refers to the degree to which the findings can be inferred to other settings such as a wider population or similar settings. An example of threat to validity is the “historical effect” confounds that affects an experiment
Scientific studies can only be done on a proportional presentation of the population or even non-human models due to the unpredictability of results. Consequently researchers have been faced with criticism on external validity of their findings. The external