The paper "The Negatives Use of Reinfusion Drains in the Surgical Setting" is purposed to analyze the use of reinfusion drains in the surgical setting. This process has many life-threatening shortcomings, for example, the infection of the parts that come into contact with the tubes. …
This can be due to using unsterilized tubes or getting infected instruments into the delicate internals of the patient. There are also cases where patients had the pipes physically damaging the delicate internal parts during insertion or removal or from mechanical failure of the machines used in the process (Helms & Quan, 2006). Placing the tubes inferior to the pleural cavity has been found out to increase chances of damaging the spleen, liver or diaphragm. In the very unlucky cases, there have been injuries to the heart or other blood veins especially when the affected area occurs near the heart.
The minor issues arising from the procedure include coughing especially after the removal of a large amount of liquid or air which creates a kind of vacuum in the chest cavity (Norton, 2008). Shortness of breath is also a common occurrence usually accompanied by a feeling of anxiety after the procedure. Most pains go away after the tube is removed from the body and therefore should not worry the patient in any way. Care should be taken though that persistent pain is checked in the shortest time possible since there could be internal injuries. The minor complications are usually associated with the general process and common among all those who have undergone the process (DeWald, 2003).
The most important cautionary measure that medical practitioners undertaking this process need to take into consideration though is the prevention of clogging of the tubes during the fluid, pus or air removal (Atluri, 2006). ...
Cite this document
(“The Negatives Use of Reinfusion Drains in the Surgical Setting Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/nursing/588995-the-negatives-use-of-reinfusion-drains-in-the-surgical-setting
(The Negatives Use of Reinfusion Drains in the Surgical Setting Research Paper)
“The Negatives Use of Reinfusion Drains in the Surgical Setting Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/nursing/588995-the-negatives-use-of-reinfusion-drains-in-the-surgical-setting.
Prophylactic antibiotics treatment is delivered to patients, since overwhelming evidence demonstrates that this practice lowers the incidence of SSI. Although research-based guidelines for infection prevention in surgery have been published, a relevant heterogeneity in the use of these measures exists showing the need for further regulation and implementation (Beckmann et al., 2011).
In many hospitals great care and staffing are assigned to ensure that infectious outcomes are limited via adequate administration, cross checking, and backup protocols. Through the Stetler Model, we will apply nursing techniques and applications to design a model for a smaller community hospital setting using current research models to write nursing guidelines for surgical antibiotic immunoprophylaxis.
The Surgical Count in Perioperative Nursing (Evidence-Based Practice and Applied Nursing Research). Can you imagine a person living with a surgical instrument like sponge or adson tissue forceps negligently left inside his body after an appendectomy surgical procedure?
Surgical site infections can be broadly classified based on the site and extent of infection into two groups: Incisional and organ-space surgical site infections. Incisional infections are also divided into two broad categories: superficial (subcutaneous and tissue infections) and deep infections (Alvarado, 2000).
Other surgical site infections are exceedingly grave and may involve body tissues found under the skin, the organs or the implanted substance. It is therefore without doubt that surgical site infections represent a considerable portion of infections associated with health care.
743). According to CMS, “a never event must be unambiguous, preventable, serious, and either adverse, indicate of a problem in the facility, or important for public credibility and accountability”; and the eight conditions CMS initially addressed are “catheter-associated urinary tract infections, vascular catheter-associated infections, and surgical site infections after coronary artery bypass grafting, certain orthopedic surgeries, and bariatric surgery” (as cited in Brown et al, 2009).
Significantly the Framework to be used in checking the credibility of the article and the information therein is Fogg’s credibility framework, however other sources will also be consulted and they include University of