The basic difference with respect to the reporting and presentation of results between a peer-reviewed journal article and a research report for an organization or institution is of structuring and organization of information. The layout and organization of the text is more…
However, the academic standards of a peer-reviewed journal are higher and more sophisticated than those of other organizations. “Generally journals of this nature do not have illustrations and use black print on white paper” (Hensley, 2012) whereas organizational research reports employ the use of other colors also. Writing of peer-reviewed journal articles is more meaningful, self-explanatory, brief, clearer, and free of phrases and idioms whereas organizational reports are less particular about these things. Overall, journal article writing is more formal than other research reports.
There are a number of reasons for these differences of standards. Firstly, the viewership of a journal article is much wider and larger than that of a research report of an organization, which imparts the need for writing to be precise and clear. Secondly, the definite layout makes it convenient for peer-reviewers to evaluate a journal article by passing it through the official editorial process (usa-document.com, n.d.), while peer-reviewing may not be required for ordinary research reports of other ...
Cite this document
(“Difference between peer reviewed journal article and a research report Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/nursing/631043-difference-between-peer-reviewed-journal-article-and-a-research-report-of-an-organization
(Difference Between Peer Reviewed Journal Article and a Research Report Essay)
“Difference Between Peer Reviewed Journal Article and a Research Report Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/nursing/631043-difference-between-peer-reviewed-journal-article-and-a-research-report-of-an-organization.
Human civilization would not have developed from its primitive form had the human being not put their efforts in exploring new things to make their life better. In every aspect of our life development is not possible without proper research. For conducting research there are some particular methods that should be followed, otherwise the results of the research would not be viable.
These are called limitations a person is experiencing. The purpose of this study is simply helping these limitations from thirty different personality facets of the NEO-PI-3 to five identity dimensions. As an abstract of the total research identity identification is aided by high-level consciousness and to a lesser amount on the high levels of extraversion and low-levels of neuroticism.
These parts are divided into the following: (1) general identification of issue/s addressed, (2) content present in the literature review, (3) the issue’s context, (4) questions and ideas that have jumped started the research, (5) an exploration of the way the research methodology has been conducted, (6) how the data obtained was analysed, and finally (7) how all the data collected have been communicated in writing.
The inherent inquisitiveness of man provides the impetus for invention, innovation, and research. Research is a better tool that has assisted man to move ahead.
Aquino (1981, 3) defined research as the systematic search
When the congress created this law, it was a noble course, but currently has changed to be where people commit crimes. Parker (1997) gave an account where welfare groups as been used as a platform of making fraudulent money. People like
In this case, age is usually a great determinant. For instance, a 13 year old child can provide response to more complex questions than a child who is 7 years old. The five year age difference is a lot when it comes to learning how to interpret responses from
This paper looks at the peer review process at Cancer Treatment Centers of America and the ways in which it is similar to other organizations. It then looks at ways in which it can be improved. It finally looks at the way the process
However, the systems were very expensive and difficult to maintain. The company did not give accurate and consistent results over time. The systems were not modernized enough to move with the changing modern times. The last