You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Letter to the Committee Saying Why Brain Rejuvenation Should Not Be Allowed
Pages 4 (1004 words)
Dear members, While there exists a general consensus of the benefits of medical transplant towards saving lives and giving persons a second chance in life, it becomes very necessary that advancements in the medical field towards replacement of body organs be examined keenly with a view to determine the issues surrounding such a process.
Within the context of brain transplant, a person is only identical to the later person if the later person has the entire body as the earlier person, subsequently, brain rejuvenation results to memory duplication whereby a person’s memory can be used by several other persons. Prior to the suggested “brain rejuvenation” procedure on Nick, Dr. Mathews performed a “brain transplant” operation on Julia North and subsequently the members of the committee agreed that Julia North’s life was saved. Perhaps we may need to understand a few basics and events that led to this case. Before this operation, Julia North was a young woman run over by a car in efforts to save the life of a child who wandered onto the tracks. Mary Frances who was the child’s mother had stroke while watching the events unfold. The two victims were brought to this facility where Dr. Mathews performed his ‘Brain transplant’ operation which the committee approved and agreed that saved Julia’s life. It is also important to note that at the time of accident, the survivor, Julia North’s body was dying and the brain was okay and Dr. Mathews transferred her brain into another body. ...
Not exactly what you need?