Scurlock-Evans, L. Stephens, D. Upton, D. (2012). The Adoption and Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) among Allied Health Professions. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation 19 (9), pp. 497-503.
Evidence Based Practice (EBP) is being…
The basic idea behind this EBP is, healthcare organizations or healthcare practitioners including AHPs while carrying out their tasks will pick the best possible evidences that are ‘available’, or even the best applicable information obtainable, so that they can carry out their tasks in an effective manner, and also take competent decisions. “Evidence based practice is an approach to decision making, during which medical practitioners uses the best evidences available, particularly in consultation with the patient, to decide upon the option or approach which suits that patient best.” (Armstrong and Gray, 2009, pg. 20). This utilization of EBP among the AHPs is the subject of discussion in the article, The Adoption and Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) among Allied Health Professions written by Penney Upton, Laura Scurlock-Evans, Danielle Stephens and Dominic Upton. Thus, this article will be critically reviewed here focusing on the various aspects of article, including its purpose, its literature review, methodology, sampling process, data collection process, study’s results finally ending with clinical implications.
The authors of the article Upton, Scurlock-Evans, Stephens and Upton lay out the purpose of the study at the outset itself, which is “to assess and characterise adoption of EBP within AHP’s clinical practice.” (Upton et al. 2012). They expand on the purpose of the study by basically defining EBP, and by explaining about the target group of the study. According to the authors, EBP is an important and widely accepted practice in healthcare settings to ensure that health care professionals particularly AHP are provided information about the recent evidences and also the researches relating to their clinical practice. To study about EBP adoption among AHPs, the authors focused on AHPs working in NHS Scotland. The authors particularly focused on the newly qualified AHPs, ...
Cite this document
(“Critical review; Quantitative studies Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/nursing/663700-critical-review-quantitative-studies
(Critical Review; Quantitative Studies Research Paper)
“Critical Review; Quantitative Studies Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/nursing/663700-critical-review-quantitative-studies.
Quantitative researches typically specify the number of research participants as sample from the population and display the data on numerous events taking place or biological variables. There is a statistical section in the research that reflects the cause and effect relationships.
and it makes one a better thinker in every aspect of life: in career, and as a consumer, citizen, friend, parent, and lover. “Critical thinking is the disciplined art of ensuring that you use the best thinking you are capable of in any set of circumstances.” (Paul and Elder, 7) Therefore, the role of critical thinking in personal life is indubitable and “good critical skills can also help one make wise decisions.” (Hitchcock, 4) It is fundamental to recognize that critical thinking can contribute considerably to one’s overall success in personal life as well as professional life.
The workplace stress has emerged has one of the most critical factors that significantly impacts the performance outcome of the organizations. The researchers had made especial efforts to assess the role of self efficacy in meeting the challenges of various stress related factors like conflict situations, overloading of work, role conflict etc.
However there is a third approach known as the mixed method study that combines the approaches of both qualitative and quantitative approaches. Quantitative research is sometimes termed as positivist or empiricist approach that entails the systematic investigation of different phenomena through the use of statistical and computational techniques (Bockmon & Rieman 1987)..
Generally, it is desired that this will have a 95% confidence level with a margin error of 5% as stated by GEO (2006, p.1). Qualitative research reflects data compiled by personal observations of people and what they say and do, and in the case of diagnosed schizophrenia, what stigmas are attached, as indicated by Knight et al.
Harvey (2002) describes quantitative data as data which can be sorted, classified, measured in a strictly "objective" way - they are capable of being accurately described by a set of rules or formulae or strict procedures which then make their definition (if not always their interpretation) unambiguous and independent of individual judgments.
Validity entails the extent to which the result from a given quantitative research is true and lacks bias. Validity can be internal or external validity where internal validity entails the extent to which the observed effects