Evidence-Based Practice Project - Admission/Application Essay Example

Evidence-Based Practice Project Evidence-Based Practice Project Clinical significance is the practical imperativeness of a treatment effect which tests whether it has a noticeable effect on the daily life of an individual (Hoffmann, Bennett, & Del, 2009). In this case, the clinical significance shows to what extent the treatment was effective or the changes it can caused to a patient. On the other hand, statistical significance evidence is important in hypothesis testing whereby; the relationship between variables is tested that is null hypothesis.

However, achievement of the statistically significant evidence favors the rejection of the null hypothesis with no proves or evidence that the null hypothesis is false (Hoffmann, Bennett, & Del, 2009). Clinical significant evidence This is the commonly used method for testing. It optimally produces quantified information concerning the importance of a certain research or finding by the use of effect size, number needed to treat and preventive fraction (Hoffmann, Bennett, & Del, 2009).

The effect size is used to determine to what extent a sample deviates from the expectations. It tends to concentrate on group effects rather than the individual effects. This may give false results because different individuals react differently to different treatments. The use of this method also caters for the side effects that might be caused by the diagnosis applied. For this reason, it ensures the patients are not at a risk of using the prescription in future. It also determines the kind of patients that would react to various diagnoses hence increases its effectiveness (Keele, 2011).

Clinical significant evidence is also effective because it be used for future reference as the method takes into account the changes that might occur to patients. In addition, there are various methods used in the calculation and determination of clinical significance. Some of those methods include; Jacobson-truax method, Edwards-nunnally method, Hageman-arrindell method and hierarchical linear modeling (Keele, 2011).Statistical significant evidence The method is equally important in the field of medicine.

Here, medical studies are carried out on specific selected samples of people. The main objective of this method is to apply the findings to another different population (Keele, 2011). Accuracy of the research is mostly determined by the size of the population. Accuracy of the experiment tends to be high with larger populations as compared to smaller populations where the results are doubtful (Hoffmann, Bennett, & Del, 2009). The method can be in a position to determine the reaction of different patients to different drugs as it deals with group and individuals.

Due to the above, the method is mostly referred to as being erroneous. The side effects of the various drugs are also not taken into consideration which may adversely affect its users. Therefore, statistical significance evidence uses probability to determine its results or findings hence cannot be of much importance in the future since the statistics may change (Keele, 2011). In cases where the results obtained through the two different methods is highly regrettable, as the results cannot be used in clinical decision-making.

Therefore, if any finding produces results that are either not statistically or clinically significant are not beneficial to the medics, as it cannot be used in critical or any decision making. For this reason, the inferences obtained should be close to enable an effective decision as discussed (Keele, 2011).ReferencesHoffmann, T., Bennett, S., & Del, M. C. (2009). Evidence-based practice across the health professions. Chats wood, N.S.W: Elsevier Australia.Keele, R. (2011). Nursing research and evidence-based practice: Ten steps to success.

Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.