Healthcare Reform Debates - Essay Example

Moreover, ethical rationing needs thoughtful choices directed by reasonably practical principles and just procedures. Therefore, physicians must be able to decide who to see first and the duration they will spend with each patient. Concisely, rationing must embrace efficiency where decisions are made to produce good outcomes. In addition, all individuals must be treated equally but the worst off must be favoured. Patients who are in critical condition should be considered for treatment first, and those who are less ill should come later after the critical ones have been attended to (Hoffman, 2008).

Doctors need to assist individuals without discrimination. The action of rationing in health care conforms to my professional and personal ethics this is because it does not conflict with any ethical codes (White, 2010). Its main aim is to promote and protect the health of the public through reasonable decisions that will ensure every individual is treated depending on his or her condition. For instance, a doctor can decide to handle a particular case over another one since it is urgent and may lead to death if not handled quickly. This is not against any ethical code, but it is part of maintaining a healthy nation and reducing mortality rates (Fuchs & Emanuel, 2005).