Negligence ahs been defined as failure to use such care as a careful person would use under the same circumstances. When a professional commits negligence, this is malpractice, but not all malpractice amounts to negligence. In the United States of America, the reported cases of malpractice are mainly held with the medical sector and in the health care departments. This can be attributed to lack of enough care providers, lack of expertise, poor working situation, poor staffing and inadequate qualified health care professionals, pressure at work among others. However, this should not be used as an excuse for negligence and malpractice in the sector (Brenner, 2010). A person who sustains legal harm following a suit on negligence can sue in a court of law and is liable to be compensated. The advances in the innovation sector such as the use of internet has produced knowledgeable patients on the issue of healt care who are much aware of the risks of treatment. In this case, patients can be able to assess for themselves information and analyse of the reasonableness of the care they are receiving. In the US, malpractice is legally classified as a tort and can be either intentional or unintentional where a person is entitled to compensation In the courts of law, the plaintiff needs to proof acts of neglince or malpractice by the defendant. A plaintiff must show that the defendant owed the plaintif a specific duty, the defendant breached the duty, the plaintiff was harmed and that the breach of this duty caused the harm (Brenner, 2010). The defendants in this case are the facility and the staff members in which Antonio Garcia was admitted to. The wife to Antonio is the plaintiff who has filed a case of malpractice and negligence against the hospital for the death of her husband. The hospital facility is liable for putting Antonio Garcia on soft restraints and failing to provide a direct one on one patient observation. This can be viewed in terms of negligence in which the staff failed to allocate necessary security to oberve the patient on a direct basis. Secondly, the patient was on soft restraint which might not have been the best way to handle him and he was not given full care based on professionl guidance and counseling. The staff in the hospital should be held liable for professional malpractice. On the other hand, the wife can also be held responsible for failing to report the matter earlier to the police on the fact that her husband needed to commit suiside after which proper action would have been taken. This is contributory negligence on her part punishable by law. The court is likely to rule that the hospital compensate in form of damages to the wife with a lesser amount equal to the part of her contributory negligence in the case. In this case, both will have been liable based on the propotion of their contribution. It can also rule that Antonio was not a voluntary patient and therefore the wife is not to be compensated. Examples of court decisions that support my opinion relate to Estate of WilliamsVMarworth. In this case, the plaintif had claims that the rehab facility had a patient who had wondared out of the grounds and died. They alleged that the nurses had not not watched him closely and had allowed him to leave three more time. The defense noted that the patient had been a voluntary patient. another example is Estate of Woodworth V Brown where the plaintiff claims warning signs went unnoticed because the nurse was not
Cite this document
(“Malpractice/Negligence and Liability Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/nursing/85777-malpractice-negligence-and-liability
(Malpractice/Negligence and Liability Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Malpractice/Negligence and Liability Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/nursing/85777-malpractice-negligence-and-liability.
Cited: 0 times
Title Name Institution Professor Date Organizations are responsible for the goods they produce and where applicable are liable for legal harm sustained. This is the same in medical practice where the professionals involved are responsible for any malpractice and negligence in the course of their work…
Control over a Third Party.
The establishment of negligence claims relies heavily on the specific relationships between parties. Negligence claims against a third party, under omissions and acts, can only be imposed when all the elements of negligence claims have been proved.
197 (1993). The wrong must result in some sort of injury that is compensable by monetary damages. Some of these include: loss of earnings capacity, pain and suffering, and reasonable medical expenses. (Cornell University School of Law, Legal Information Institute).
Tort law plays a fundamental role in healthcare delivery services .It encompasses a number of key areas within the healthcare system. These include negligence, intentional torts and infliction of mental torts. Torts have a direct impact on a healthcare institution through these three areas.
Such negligence also occurs by failure to act by practitioners with knowledge of the situations but instead deviate from laid down protocols and procedures without valid reasons, resulting in patients’ injury or death. Medical malpractice is a demonstration of disregard in a medical practitioner’s professional and licensed faculty, illustrated by not adhering to standards of practice and causing harm or death (Leonhardt, 2009).
In addition, the hospital facility had previously implemented a computerized system that could facilitate in the narcotic distribution process in the facility. In this case, every nurse in the health facility has the personal responsibility of documenting the time, details and dosage that has been administered to each patient.
Based on the facts of the case, the author of the paper provides two acts of John that should be considered in determining his criminal liability, namely, (a) pushing and kicking Neil, (b) pushing Annabelle into the stationary car and subsequently stabbing her with a bunch of keys. The author discusses each of these instances.
The ingredient, nuts, was not supposed to be part of product. This amounted to negligence. As decided in the case Donoghue v Stevenson, the company has an obligation to care about the welfare of its customers with regard to its products. The repercussions can be
This is demonstrated by the fact that she went for lunch before she informed the physician that the patient’s condition needed immediate attention. Nurses are obliged by the Nursing Practice Act to communicate all pertinent information to
According to the modern healthcare and clinical practices, the risk assessment processes include a set of steps that can be easily implemented by the institutions to deal with potential hazards or clinical risks (Boland, 2010; National Patient
1 pages (250 words)Assignment
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Assignment on topic Malpractice/Negligence and Liability for FREE!