Facts In this case there are various notable facts that will greatly help when giving the judgment. In addition these facts will clearly reveal any misconduct and its perpetrator. In the career history of the subject nurse, she has carried herself with dignity and as such she has gained respect for her competence and dedication. However, suspicions have emerged that this nurse has been diverting narcotics for her personal use without following the laid down procedures. Further, the organization that this nurse is working in has recently installed a computerized medical cabinet to supplement the traditional paper medication administration record (MAR). Consequently, every nurse is expected to fill their handwritten MAR’s and they should match with the computerized records. On further, investigation it is noted that the nurses fill their MARs later and they con fessed to having forgotten some of the drugs they had taken from the medical cabinet. Action In a case that this case goes to trial the defendant in this case would be the health facility while subject nurse the plaintiff would be the. The reason as to why the nurse would be the complainant is that she will be defending her right from being suspended. In any case, the facility would have gotten justice from suspending her. Further, this matter should not be forwarded to the state board of nursing. The reason for this is because this is an issue that has no enough evidence of the misconduct of the nurse. Moreover, the issue is more on the implementation of modern monitoring systems in the facility rather than on the misconduct of a practitioner. Further, it is important to note that this is a civil matter in which the defendant wants to be reinstated in her previous employment. As such the matter will be handled by the industrial court but not a criminal court. a) Did the facility have sufficient evidence to suspend the nurse? According to the facts in this case it is apparent that this hospital had a mechanism that was not competent. The mechanism should have been overseen by single personnel to ensure that the nurses filled in the MRAs promptly. Moreover, other nurses have confessed that they had at one time forgotten about the actual quantities they had taken from the medial cabinet consequently filling arbitrary figures. On this regards, there are many loopholes in this mechanism and hence the biggest responsibility lies with the institution and not with the nurses. However, ethics have it that the nurses should conduct themselves competently (Roussel, Swansburg, & Swansburg, 2006). In this regard, the facility does not have sufficient evidence to suspend the nurse. The most sensible and practical action would have been to streamline the recording procedures. In so doing the nurses would fill in the MAR immediately after taking the narcotics. a) How should the testimony of the other nurses in the unit affect the outcome of this case? The rule of law should not be biased or discriminatory. In this essence, the testimony of the other nurses weakens the evidence/suspicions and the ground on which the institution has suspended the subject nurse on. These testimonies have shown that it is the institution that has created a loophole in the dispensation of narcotics hence it has become vulnerable to misappropriation. As such, if this nurse was to be suspended, then all the other nurses who testified to having recorded wrong
Legal Aspects of nursing Name: Institution: Date Abstract The codes of ethics in the nursing profession states that the nurse should act competently. Moreover, in the constitution it is well stipulated that any public officer should safeguard all tools that aid him/her in the course of dispensing their duty…
Consequently, Mrs. M sued the hospital due to neglect by personnel. The paper reviews the legal aspects of the case with recommendations for appropriate policy changes in nursing care and amendments of the procedures manual. In addition, the disciplinary action of the nurse and untrained personnel is discussed.
When acceptable standards of operations are not adhered to, patients may suffer harm and catastrophe as a result of failure of health practitioners and organizations. In addition to medical experts’ duty to ensure safety of patients, the patients also have a moral obligation to safeguard their own well-being while undergoing treatment.
Patient safety is the most important part of healthcare practice, thus, medical practitioners are to do their best to protect patients against harm, which is a primary priority for every physician. Byers and White define patient safety as the freedom from events that may cause harm within the process of health provision (21).
Needless to say, offering proficient nursing care also engrosses employing knowledgeable ruling and decision making process. Knowledgeable decision making necessitates the nurse to utilize her dexterities and understanding, in addition to identifying when she requires extra support.
This particular scenario stretches from a legal aspect view, and a literal view of the incident. The main reason behind the existence of the two different firms is that the instance whereby Mr. Abraham succumbed to death, in one way or the other, the shift of blames suddenly arose.
The rampant cases of healthcare malpractices by the nurses raise concern and legal framework has to be made even tighter to curb negligence as one of the greatest vice in this profession. Considering the case at hand, a tricky situation is presented against the facility as the defendant for suspending the nurse.
First, the patient herself reported that she wanted to commit suicide. That is a principle to protect the safety of the patient even if it is made by the patients themselves. Second, the police leaves the patient; Judy, under hospital care since her life could be at risk with depression and stress if not helped by a psychiatrist, that is majorly why the police take them to the hospital where medical health could be found the third principle is that the patient is placed under psychiatrist check and a nurse is assigned to the patient for around the clock monitoring and check (NPSG, 2013).
This essay presents that patient safety in medical field is the greatest and paramount thing that practicing professionals as well as the legal frameworks strive earnestly to realize in the day-to-day operations.However, failure to observe patient safety results to lengthy stay in the hospital by patients, permanent injuries as well as even death.
Patient safety is at the center of the roles of medical practitioners and protecting patients against harm is a primary priority for every physician. Byers and Susan defines patient safety as the freedom from events that may result to harm from the