How Eugenics Contributed to Hitler’s Nazi Final Solution Word Count: 500 (2 pages) Eugenics is not a new concept, but was a movement which cropped up in the early 20th century as a way to control who reproduced and who did not—based upon desirable characteristics of those who were allowed to reproduce…
Eugenics is a movement that was planned before World War II in Germany in 1923 and 1933, which ultimately changed the lives of millions of people. Before World War II ever came along, there was a movement in Germany to rid society of undesirables. Undesirables fell into several categories later on, although initially the report that was issued seemed like a simple plot to rid society of disabilities by not allowing certain sectors of the populace to reproduce due to defects or detriments of some sort. “In May 1923, [physician Gerhard] Boeters sent a report to the government of Saxony in which he demanded compulsory sterilization for the hereditarily blind and deaf, the mentally handicapped, the mentally ill, sexual ‘perverts,’ and fathers with two or more illegitimate children.”1 Sterilization was the beginning of a regime change which began to discriminate against individuals that were different or “not normal” in some way. ...
Cite this document
(“How did eugenics contribute to the final solution Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/other/20166-how-did-eugenics-contribute-to-the-final-solution
(How Did Eugenics Contribute to the Final Solution Essay)
“How Did Eugenics Contribute to the Final Solution Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/other/20166-how-did-eugenics-contribute-to-the-final-solution.
Conclusion 6 References 8 1. Introduction The development of organizational activities in the global market has led to the increase of competition but also to the increase of the risks involved in firms’ daily operations. Top managers and executives have been often criticized as of their contribution in the development of inter-organizational conflicts; the reason is that the rules related to the compensation of the above individuals come to opposition with the interests of the rest of employees.
In his article, Politically Correct Eugenics: Brownback and Kennedy do the right thing, Wesley J. Smith discusses the human race’s slow march towards eugenics. He points out that aborting fetuses diagnosed with abnormalities is commonplace now. Despite advocating human rights, studies show that abortion of such babies is ‘encouraged’ in the United States of America.
The period was an exclusive mixture of reality and mystery. In the words of Mattogno (2008), “What strikes one most in the voluminous literature dedicated to the "extermination" of the Jews is the disparity existing between so grave an accusation and the fragility of the evidence furnished for its support”.
First coined by English scientist Francis Galton by 1883, the discipline looks to be seeking inspiration from Darwinian doctrine of Survival of the Fittest (1859), where Charles Darwin submits to state that only the superior, powerful and refined species survive in the world because of their multiplication through their future generations; and thus they are capable of successfully transferring their genes to their descendants.
After the WWII, United Nations Headquarters were established in Geneva. Rich in history and business oriented activities, Rue du Marche became a stronghold for tourism and business activities. Banking businesses are dominant on the street, local and international, private and public. Following this fact, expatriate populations have come up.
In the early 20th century eugenics thrived as a popular belief system to the point that over 30 states had eugenic programs of sterilization in the United States (Joseph 342). More horrific adaptations of eugenics occurred in Hitler’s Germany.
However, with eugenics' past history as a tool of repressive governments and its image as a coercive tool, is there any way in which a democratic government would be able to utilise eugenics. However, due to flaws within Dr Miller's theory of genetics, and his proposals for eugenics are impractical, it should be argued that Dr Miller's ideas are not politically feasible.
Now, what is the family? It is where the child is born, raised, educated and cared for. The basic functions of the family are: reproduction, protection, socialization, regulation of sexual behavior, affection and