Running head: knowledge Knowledge is the true organ of sight, not the eyes. Generally, psychologists and educationalists believe that knowledge is acquired through the five senses. Of the five senses, eyes are considered to have greater impact on knowledge acquisition because knowledge gained through the sense of sight is clear, accurate and permanent (Sampath, 2007; p.32)…
Quoting Plato’s cave example, Falzon (2002) explains that like Plato’s compelling image of the cave, normal human beings tend to imagine things or believe in things that might merely be shadows or mere appearance, and that real world could be something very different. Knowledge gained through senses creates images that humans tend to imagine again and again, which might not correlate with reality most of the times. Therefore, knowledge gained through senses might not be appropriate in all situations. Instead, knowledge gained through understanding and rationality helps in misinterpreting the information that senses perceive. It is interesting to note that what we see produces limited knowledge as the information involved is limited; but, what we observe imbibes greater knowledge and information. For example, Placher (1983; p.154) quotes the example of Acquinas’s argument that explained how human beings see the changes in the world; but they realize that the changes happening in any object is because of changes happening elsewhere. The ability to see the changes happening elsewhere is observation. This observation is important for gaining an understanding of what is happening and its source as well as its outcome. ...
Cite this document
(“Knowledge is the true organ of dight, not the eyes (Theory Of Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/other/20284-knowledge-is-the-true-organ-of-dight-not-the-eyes
(Knowledge Is the True Organ of Dight, Not the Eyes (Theory Of Essay)
“Knowledge Is the True Organ of Dight, Not the Eyes (Theory Of Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/other/20284-knowledge-is-the-true-organ-of-dight-not-the-eyes.
The author defines the knowledge as the acquaintance of facts, tenets and truths from a study or investigation or as acquaintance of facts and truths from experience. This definition leads him to conclude that theory of knowledge is a justified true belief. He discusses knowledge from a propositional point of view.
Today, the process continues and the quest for knowledge is present in all aspects of human endeavor. Certainly, there are several means developed to achieve this but the most important point out of this fact is that methods became systematic and scientific that enabled people to identify and acquire knowledge in several ways.
However, believing something does not amount to knowing something because as Audi states, a belief that is untrue is not knowledge (n.p.). On the other hand, a belief that results from a lucky guess also does not amount to knowledge regardless of the fact that it might be true (Audi n.p.).
Plato was dedicating his writings to someone he had great respect for. His later works do not always feature Socrates though often this was the case. In analyzing Plato's theory of knowledge it is necessary to talk about the myth of the platonic cave.
Drucker) in The New Realities. It is an awareness of a fact. Information with clear and certain mental apprehension.
Complete knowledge can be translated into formal language, including words and numbers, mathematical expressions, and provision manuals, etc.
Infants can feel a touch even before their senses have fully developed. Similarly, eyes are merely organs of physical perception. When we acquire knowledge, we actually understand something or gain insight. Until then, it merely remains
Knowledge claims must be supported by reason, or the knowledge claim does not have a basis to be truly considered knowledge. It can be regarded as a number of other things, such as a feeling. The dependence on reason is varied between areas of knowledge, as reason is much more important in the natural sciences and mathematics.
Whatever definition given, it should at one time or another state categorically or imply that knowledge is a belief. A strong correlation between knowledge and the mind has been drawn. Knowledge cannot exist outside the mind i.e. no
Our imagination has the ability to create an occasion that has not happened or exists. As human beings we imagine all the time and most of our thinking takes little or no conscious effort. You could almost say
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Knowledge is the true organ of dight, not the eyes (Theory Of Knowledge Essay) for FREE!