(United States v. Lopez, 1995) This was a landmark case in that it established the supremacy of the Federal Courts over state courts and jurisdiction within individual states. However, the end result of the case was that the charges by the federal government were dismissed and in a statement by Judge Rehnquist the reasoning was that it was time to step in and check the powers of the federal government by defining the powers between the federal government and the individual state. The prosecutions argument rested the use of the Interstate Commerce Act, this act specifically being designed to prevent unfair business practices by shifting regulatory abilities from the state governments to that of the federal government. (Interstate Commerce Act, 1887) The case was upheld by a decision of 5-4 and helped define what was allowed directly by the Interstate Commerce Act. Supreme Court Justice Rehnquist made it clear that this incident was not something that should be allowed under the Commerce Act however, further stated that this decision was not meant to change prior decisions in regards to the Commerce Act. The decision was meant only to limit the current scope of the Federal Government in regards to incidents occurring within each individual state. The decision clarified the separation of power that exists between the individual states and that of the Federal Government.
Cite this document
(“Federal courts jurisdiction Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/other/22987-federal-courts-jurisdiction
(Federal Courts Jurisdiction Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words)
“Federal Courts Jurisdiction Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/other/22987-federal-courts-jurisdiction.
Cited: 0 times
Running header: UNITED STATES VERSUS ALFONSO LOPEZ, Jr. United States versus Alfonso Lopez, Jr.: discussion of limitations of federal power United States versus Alfonso Lopez, Jr. In the case of United States versus Alfonso Lopez, Jr. 514 U.S. 549 a 12th grade student Alfonso Lopez, Jr…
The Federal Court system comprises of the trial courts, the Appellate Courts and the High Court. Each level follows a hierarchy of jurisdiction beginning from the most basic of trial courts that is the federal district courts until the court of last resort that is the Supreme Court.
Under international law, a jurisdiction in criminal matters can be either enforcement jurisdiction or prescribed, also known as prescriptive jurisdiction. Enforcement jurisdiction is the state’s power to apply national criminal law through its enforcement institutions such as the police or the executive via the courts (O’Keefe, 736-737).
Different states and federal administrative bodies have jurisdictions over the conduct of private sector investigators, as well as private employers. According to Barbara (2001), Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) have the authority to review charges against employers and their agents of unfair discriminatory practices and labor practices.
The Legislative branch makes the laws of the land. The Executive branch executes the laws of the land. The Judiciary interprets the laws of the land and it is the branched possessed with the power of judicial review.
Judicial review is that specific power of
Although the federal law is a complex set of statutes and court decisions, its basic principle is simply based on the concept of the rights of the expenditure of federal funds and collecting debts. (Office of General Counsel, 1994)
History of Federal Courts. United
t select where will they file their case as each court has its own level of jurisdiction and it must be taken to notice as to whether or not the court decided upon has enough authority to decide over a case or not. There are three types of jurisdiction; that is: exclusive,
Supreme Court normally functions based on the guidelines, passed by the Congress. Under normal circumstances, Supreme Court hears cases which were unresolved in trail courts, appellate courts and state courts. Most of the cases appear in
Personal jurisdiction is the constitutional right of a defendant that he may have some interaction with the council of the court, so that the court can implement its power over the defendant. While, subject-matter
All the domains and severs in America whether domestic or foreign owned are administered by the USA authorities (Spinello 112). This issue has brought a lot of controversy and legal pursuits between USA government and the corporate world. The
4 pages (1000 words)Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Federal courts jurisdiction for FREE!