Ruling Elites in History - Essay Example

History indicates the individuals as the ruling elites. Ruling Elites are people who are most proactive in politics, they are the people behind setting monetary policies, and they build up standards for investments and the amount of capital, which can be concentrated at home country and elsewhere (Fraser, 35-42). In particular, their economic influence, their monopolization of media, and their high-paid lobbyists encode that create chief political candidates and formulate future policies as well. Although they are very few in number, they exercise a very large amount of influence. Their wealth serves their power, and their power serves their wealth.

After World War II and with a lot of pressure in the Reagan revolution, there was a gathered consensus that classes and the elites should rule rather than the impersonal forces of the market. In American history, it has been an observation that the American Oligarchy did its best to promote the notion that it does not exist. However, the success of its vanishing act was also dependant on the arduous efforts of the public to believe in egalitarian fiction and their reluctance to see a hidden thing in plain sight (Eyal, Szelenvi, Townsley, pp. 40-47). In history, analysis has indicated that apart from the ruling elites, none of the population had any sort of political representation. In fact, the economic elites had even formulated their own monetary coup and were going to wage a war in order to bring down the U.S middle class (Fraser, 27).

The Ruling Elite history in America can come into comparison with that of the Western Civilization. During the 18th century in Europe, the industrial era began. Religious wars were very dominant. Even when the conflicts involved other factors, the religious issues always enjoyed preference and were at the forefront. However, the Protestant Reformation broke the religious unity and it took a long time for the Europeans to get themselves out of this issue and concur that religious unity can only be possible at the local level.

In the course of these conflicts, the Europeans defined at length what they believed about God, churches, and their rapport with the individual and the state. They also produced a very large body of art and literature related to these issues, the philosophies of Hobbes and Locke came into formation in the context of their religious dogma, and beliefs that indicate the religious form of elites during this period (Lane, pp. 56-68). Secondly, another important theme of this period was economic change. Europe entered into a world market, which was being fueled by a very good supply of bullion from the New World, and this changed the face of Europe’s economy. This was the age of Capitalism, but it badly upset the social order. The ruling elites were hoarding money, merchandise and capital at home, while the poor bereft of money and goods were becoming more impoverished than over. This led to a great divide amongst the two classes.

The above two examples demonstrate different instances and forms of Ruling Elites in history and how they exercised power over their weaker clan. It also showed how ruling elites take different types of forms and how they differed from other civilizations.