Compare Huntington’s (1993) argument in “The clash of civilizations” to that of Wendell Bell (2004) “Humanities’ common Values.” In your opinion, which one is more convincing? Why? Samuel Huntington’s Clash of Civilizations hypothesis has attracted both appreciation and criticism…
There is much credence to this thesis, as a quick glance at history of last millennia will reveal. During ancient times, the chief source of identification came from the tribe or clan to which an individual belonged. Since life was harsh, brutal and short, there was no scope for identification beyond this narrow realm. But as civilization progressed our societies got organized in terms of kingdoms and other smaller autocratic domains. Conflict between two groups could still arise on the basis of differences in cultures or religions or languages, etc, but limitations of geography, locomotive technology and lack of sophisticated organization meant that instances of clashes between civilizations was not frequent. But in the modern world, especially since the industrial revolution, technological advancement (especially in areas of transportation, telecommunication) alongside global economic integration has shrunk the distance between civilizations, making them prone to friction and conflict. Of the seven major civilizations that Huntington identifies in his essay, the one between Islam and the West has taken center-stage in contemporary world. ...
Cite this document
(“Compare Huntington's (1993) argument in The clash of civilizations to Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/other/32861-compare-huntingtonyies
(Compare Huntington'S (1993) Argument in The Clash of Civilizations to Essay)
“Compare Huntington'S (1993) Argument in The Clash of Civilizations to Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/other/32861-compare-huntingtonyies.
The National Youth Policy of Malta emphasises on the examination of all aspects of health. This means that the health policy does not just deal with treatment of sick persons alone, it also looks at ways of preventing diseases, ensuring that the youth gain access to primary health care and also promoting healthy living.
Eyes full of understanding, hearts full of love and the life that refuses conflicts—enough, these alone are enough!
But there are strong issues that prevent the goal of universal peace, according to Samuel P. Huntington. He aptly titles his hunt,
At the intellectual level, every argument has a counter-argument. Whatever I say is correct, says the intellectual--whatever correct is there in the world belongs to me, says the one who has transcended the portals of mind. Today, the world leaders are compelled to think about globalization and veer round to the concept, ‘the world is one family.’
Globalization and tribalism is causing conflict and decline in many nations hence influencing global politics. Conventionally, economic and ideological conflicts have been termed as the source of violence in
izations has in fact fueled hate, thereby leading to the pervasiveness of “the Arab, Muslim and Palestinian terrorism” in the 21st century, which is perhaps the single most devastating nightmare to the U.S. and its allies (Wistrich, 2001). The continued onslaught of the U.S.