A real leader is capable of doing different tasks guided by his vision and reason coming from the historical experience. To make it plain, “leadership is the result of a complex set of interactions among the leader, the followers and the situation” (Cited in Byrne 20). Thus, a leader follows the most optimal way to succeed paying much tribute to his environment and the focal goals in mind. There are no leadership perspectives without goal-setting and planning elaborated by a leader. On the other hand, it is vital to touch upon the types of leadership and the notion of an effective military leadership. The question is that the efficiency in the way a military leader follows comprises a global perspective along with the national ideals. There should be a detailed understanding of what the nation longs for and why such a problem stays unsolved. Byrne identifies effective military leadership as “the ability to inspire others to willingly participate in the achievement of a shared vision set out by the leader and to assist them throughout that transformational journey” (25). Hence, these solitary traits seem to be apparent in Mustafa Kemal Ataturk. First of all, he was a leader able to make a significant change against the Muslim perspective. By establishing the National Assembly in Turkey, he gained support of the Turkish majority in turning Turkey into a secular nation-state (Polelle 44). It was one of the first steps toward modernization throughout Turkey. Second, Ataturk broke the ice of the misconception in a larger Turkish society. He was successful in his leadership skills due to the fact that he possessed all types of transformational leadership evident in his “vision, courage, rhetorical skills, determination and integrity” (Byrne 25). This is why every single step he did toward progress in providing reforms was more than just a breakthrough. It gave grounds for further modernization and constructive development of Turkey. Secularization and improvement in education were the two main goals of Ataturk’s mission. The thing is that the reforms were aimed at the following prospects, namely: secular governance, the replacement of Arabic script with Roman characters, monogamy, creating an industrial infrastructure, opening three western-mode state universities, establishment of a civil code in accordance with the European norms and standards (Reisman 7). These reforms were hard to implement without keeping a strict eye on their execution. Today, there is hardly a national leader to complete all these reforms within a short span of time. To say more, Ataturk believed that a republican idealism would become a new civic religion for Turks (Hanioglu 182). His intellectual capacity made him believe in that Turkey may reach the new heights in its overall development once the religious views on governance came in place. The moral side of the question was at stake. Mustafa Kemal was aware of that and could wait for some time to make Turks share the idea of republican idealism versus solely religious construct. Here, his rhetoric and courage complement his vision at the outset and ability to integrate toward new dimensions of national development of Turks. This is why he managed to create a new nation of Turkey based on the most progressive principles of civilian life. The authority of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk is too significant for every Turk, as he dared to transform “
The figure of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk is too iconic for every man of Turkish descent. His leadership skills and drive toward independence and improvements through social, economic, and political reforms made Turkey a modern state with modern principles of growth and development in hand…
Acquired needs theory states that a person, who needs power, achievement, and affiliation, will prove to be a successful leader. Trait Theory- Manager 1 (Bob) Bob shows sufficient integrity in his behavior. For example, he conducts regular performance appraisals by reviewing employees’ performance regularly, and giving them sincere feedback.
The tasks are assigned by the leader according to the expertise level of each employee or team member and accordingly the leaders monitor and evaluate the performance of the employees after regular intervals. This way any loop holes can be identified before the occurrence of any serious problem (Leaders Coaching Leaders, 2009).
Scholars of leadership have devised various theories relating to the characteristics portrayed by various leaders (Goleman, 1998). A leader is a person to whom an organization bestows the responsibility of showing guidance to the rest of the employees or team members.
McShane (2003) says that leaders have vision, perseverance and capacity to inspire others. Indeed, in the contemporary environment of cut throat business, the role of leaders and leadership within the organizations becomes one of the most critical aspects of competitive advantage.
Incident Highlighting Leadership Attention A recent event in our organization that has highlighted a practice that needs to be corrected is of misleading the patient for the sake of profits. A patient was admitted in the hospital, being diagnosed with the symptoms of cancer, was asked to do blood, urine and other lab tests.
It is for the leader to decide whether he has to establish that strategy alone or in due consultation with the followers, though the ultimate decision that is enforced comes from the leader in either case. Goals are achieved in teams and teams need someone to steer them toward the goals.
‘Social movement’ is considered as an enhanced example of challenge with regard to ‘status quo’. However, it requires open thoughts, open heart and open determination. Having open thoughts necessitates continuous learning and development. A depiction of ‘openness’ with regard to others’ ideas enables to foster invitation for participation as well as an enhanced level of qualitative interactions in between the leader and the follower.
The paper will first look into the definition of the two terms and what they entail and then explore into the similarities and differences of leadership and management. The paper will then discuss the importance and essence of both leadership and management in organizations and their role in streamlining organizational culture and performance of organizations.
Their performance cannot be attributed to any single factor but rather a combination of factors, one of them being the quality of coordination and interpersonal relationship between teams and their leaders. The vision of leaders, in today’s world, takes different forms which serve to streamline and dedicate team efforts into achieving a commonality in work standards.