Does leadership style matter? Name Institution Does leadership style matter? Leadership delineates the process of inspiring others towards achieving a common goal. On the other hand, leadership style refers to the characteristic manner in which a person leads others…
However, a leadership style adopted should be the most appropriate in effectively achieving the objectives of the organization. It is on this premises that it may be asserted that leadership style actually matters to large extents. On the contrary, other people hold unto beliefs that it does not matter which leadership style a leader may adopt. Thus, what matters is not the leadership style, but the leaders themselves. It is on this basis that they assert that leadership is rather innate (Hill & McShane, 2006). This implicates that leadership is predetermined by a person’s distinctive dispositional characteristics during birth. Such a leader is deemed to be born leaders and therefore his leadership is effective irrespective of the leadership style he/she may adopt. Disregarding the leadership style, such people believe that leadership entails possessing power over others. Thus, leadership is a form of power and dominance to over others. This means that no matter what leadership style, a leader must always exercise power over people. This means that the type of leadership style does not matter at all. More often than not, those who profoundly discredit leadership style believe that, leaders are positively influential. This is to imply that employees perform well when under guidance of an effective leader. This is to mean that leaders make differences in the people. Thus, no matter what leadership style, leaders are expected to be influential to the people under them. In this regards leaders are deemed to entirely control the outcomes of groups. They are in total control of their groups’ achievements. Be that as it may, management experts have evidenced that leadership styles have palpable effects on a group’s performance. Thus, different styles are effective for different situations. In this regards, each of the leadership style is appropriate in specified circumstances. In determining which leadership style to adopt, it is important to consider the leader’s personal background. This may include the leader’s personality, experience, skills, knowledge, ethics and values. It may also be worthwhile to consider the employees being supervised. Indeed, employees are usually individuals with diverse personalities and backgrounds. In considering which leadership style to adopt, it is also important to look at the company’s traditions, philosophy and values as well. This may help in choosing the most suited leadership style that may be effective for the organization. It is therefore important to critically analyze the three major leadership styles with references to where they are most effective, with the aim of establishing that leadership style matters a great deal. To commence with, democratic leadership style defines a style whereby the leader shares the decision-making abilities with the members of the group. In this style, leadership involves the sharing of ideas, discussions, debates, consultations and encouraging employees to be part of the decision making. Thus, democratic leadership is otherwise known as participative leadership style. In a democratic type of leadership, the leader is considered as a coach who make the final decision, but this has to be done after consulting various staff members. Such type of leadership may produce high quality and high quantity work. Democratic leadership style is more effective in specific instance. In this regards, it may be the appropriate leadership style ...
Cite this document
(“Leadership Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/other/7548-leadership
(Leadership Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
“Leadership Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/other/7548-leadership.
Leadership is the ability to lead a group of people or an organization. In essence, it involves the establishment of a clear vision, with a clear vivid picture of the destination, and a grasp of success and how to attain it. Secondly, the vision should be shared with others so that they can willingly follow (Northouse, 2009).
Defining the characteristics is indeed a complex process as it associates the notion of solution to diverse problems with varying intensity. In today’s world of cut throat competitive business environment organizational leadership is a huge area of study because proper leadership can uplift the performance of an organization from grass root levels to sky rocketed acceleration.
3. Leadership Potential. Discuss the common measures, and best practices, in measuring leadership success. Propose one additional theory that you would utilize to evaluate the success, or competence, of a leader. Answer: Leadership can be considered as the most critical factor while analyzing the success of an organization.
Leadership style: Autocratic. In this case, an urgent need to lay off followers is needed to avoid further dropping of company’s revenue. It needs a leadership that overrides emotional connection between the leader and the followers to avoid degeneration of
Many of these leaders have accomplishments and they have records in history as being some of the most remarkable leaders (Lussier and Achua, 2009). For example, Malcolm X was one of last century’s most pragmatic of leaders and his deeds are thus
This is understanding and controlling one’s emotions in equal proportion to understanding the emotional state of others. La Toya Jackson was fired from the show in 2011. La Toya allowed her ego to drive her
Democratic style of leadership is the direction which law enforcement leaders ought to take. Superior law enforcement leaders necessitate taking long-term, tactical views when mounting budgets as well as policies.