Introduction This paper examines three questions that relate to criminal law. In each of the questions, there is an analysis of the main issues laid out in the requirements. This is followed by an evaluation of the relevant laws and cases that define the framework of the issues raised in English law…
In the process, he releases a lion and a tiger. The lion then proceeds to kill a person nearby. The issue is whether the entry release of the dangerous animals and the subsequent killing renders Oscar liable for murder or not. In examining the murder, it is essential to evaluate if it leads to a liability of involuntary manslaughter or not. Rules In involuntary manslaughter, the actus reus is an unlawful and dangerous act. In R V Slingsby (1995), a woman died when a man conducted dangerous sexual acts on her. Although the defendant argued that it was an ordinary sexual act that had gone out of scope, it was held that he was guilty because the act was dangerous and unlawful. In R V Church (1965), the term 'dangerous' was interpreted to mean that it exposes another person to a risk of some harm. Based on this, if such an act is conducted, a person will be guilty of committing involuntary manslaughter. The mens rea of involuntary manslaughter is to commit an act that is obvious to every reasonable person as a dangerous act. In spite of this obvious indication, the defendant proceeded to commit that act. In DPP V Newbury and Jones (1976), the defendants were two teenage boys. They threw a piece of stone from a bridge into a passing train. This hit and killed a guard who was sitting in the driver's compartment. It was held that they had committed involuntary manslaughter because it was obvious to them as reasonable people that they undertook a dangerous act when they foresaw the consequences of their actions. Due to the nature of involuntary manslaughter, the most likely defence is diminished responsibility under section 2 of Homicide Act, 1957. This means that the defendant was suffering from an abnormal mind which caused him to fail to exercise willpower and committed such acts (R V Byrne 1960). Also, a person with a substantially impaired mental responsibility could be plead on the grounds of the impairment (R V Lloyd 1967). Application In this case, Oscar decides to go to the premises of Peter's circus. He did this and released the dangerous animals because he believed they were being ill-treated. In releasing the animals to prevent them from being 'ill-treated', he failed to realize that he was releasing them into a populated area where the animals could cause havoc to human beings. Releasing a lion and tiger was dangerous. Also, it is apparent that he did not seek the consent of Peter who is licensed to keep the animals under lock and key as a circus operator. This constitutes a trespass under Common Law and makes the act illegal. It should have been obvious to Oscar that an ill-treated lion or tiger was much better caged than released into the society. This is because if the caged lion or tiger is released in an urban centre, it would cause carnage and kill a lot of people. On the balance of probabilities, it should have occurred to him that releasing the animals could cost human lives. However, he did not take time to reconsider that. This makes it a valid mens rea for the commission of involuntary manslaughter. Conclusion In conclusion, Oscar committed the actus reus of unlawfully entering the premises of Peter and releasing dangerous animals that killed a human being. Also, he was negligent and did not think much about his actions. As such, he is guilty of manslaughter. Due to the circumstances, his only credible defence is to plead on the grou ...
Cite this document
(“CRIMINAL LAW Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/other/9932-criminal-law
(CRIMINAL LAW Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
“CRIMINAL LAW Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/other/9932-criminal-law.
They have moved from the north, and neither is registered with a doctor because Marlene is afraid that the baby will be taken into care. They have no income except what Paul can steal or earn playing his guitar outside the railway station. During the hard winter, Marlene becomes quite ill as a result of being weak after giving birth.
Crimes of attempts fall under two classifications: incomplete attempts and complete, but imperfect attempts. An incomplete attempt occurs, when the executor of the crime carries out some of the specific actions that are significant towards his completion of the criminal goal, but quits or is barred from continuing the criminal act to its conclusive end.
The Criminal Damage Act of 1971 explicitly has three specific offences that relate to criminal damage. These are simple criminal damage under S.1 (1), aggravated criminal damage under S.1 (2), and criminal damage by arson under S.1 (3). The central thesis of the appeal by R and G (2003) is the very definition of the adjective “recklessness”, within meaning of section 1 of the Criminal Damage Act of 1971.
The Texas statute states that if a police officer gives intent to arrest a criminal suspect and the suspect tries to flee (like in the case of the robber), “the officer may use all the necessary means to apprehend the suspect”. It is while acting under this
Analysis of the case indicates that Ben will be charged with voluntary manslaughter. According to Michaelides-Mateou and Mateou (2010, p 25), Ben acknowledges that his actions poses significant risks thus may result in the death of others. Nevertheless, such a
However, there have been numerous debates regarding the accurate definition of what actually constitute mens rea; and that has encouraged debates within the legal field. The focus of this paper is to explain the current test
Felonies are associated with prison sentences of at least one year, fines or even both while misdemeanors involve less than a year prison sentence, smaller fines or even both (Gardner, et al.15). I would make the crime a misdemeanor because is not a very
2 Pages(500 words)Coursework
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Coursework on topic CRIMINAL LAW for FREE!