In some countries like Netherlands, Denmark and so on, same-sex unions are now legally acceptable.
Urgent debates have now arisen between the homosexual community supported by the pro-gay rights activists who argue for the rights of same-sex citizens to be married just the same as heterosexual marriages; and the religious, social, moral and political authorities who do not support same-sex marriages. The legalization of same-sex marriages is thus an issue of common and urgent concern, and all voices must be heard before making a legal judgment in this situation.
In the present situation of homosexual promiscuity especially in the gay community, and the looming threat of AIDS, same sex marriage may just be the solution. It would promote monogamy, thus reigning in the danger of fatal diseases, as well as setting up an ideal for the community where two people publicly vow their life-long commitment to each other. This will also give both gay and lesbian communities a sense of being accepted. A large number of these individuals whether from gay or lesbian communities have made significant contributions to society and enforcing their right to marry would give them the freedom to live respectable lives as married couples in mainstream society. Furthermore, it would no longer be necessary for those with homosexual preferences to enter heterosexual marriages which end up in the divorce court or lead to a lifetime of frustrated conjugal life. Homosexual marriages would be just as socially acceptable, and would contribute to fewer break-ups in heterosexual relationships due to forced or involuntary participation.
But same sex marriages may be too dramatic a departure from tradition for most people where dictionaries, encyclopedias and law books all define marriage necessarily as the union of a man and a woman. The very idea of two men in suits or two women in wedding gowns on the wedding aisle may form a disconcerting picture, which a civil ceremony can only marginally mitigate. Most people consider marriage between a man and a woman to be the crucial and the most basic building unit of society, and when this changes to marriages between the same sex, it becomes an unfamiliar, bewildering territory where the threat of complete social disintegration looms large. In common perception, one of the main reasons two people get married is also for procreation, for the provision of a nurturing environment for future progeny, which would form the next generation. Homosexual couples cannot have their own children, because nature ordained the mating of the male and the female to create a new life, and thus a fruitless union of the same sex may seem somewhat unnatural, and against the continued survival of our species.
On the other hand, it may be argued that in our modern age there are various methods a same-sex married couple can use to have children, starting from adoption to artificial insemination, so this should not be an issue against same-sex marriages at all. If fertility were the basic condition for matrimony, a lot of older couples beyond the childbearing age or infertile people would have been denied the right to marry, and this is not so. More importantly, a same-sex marriage actually gives respectable status to the adopted child or artificially inseminated child, because it gives them a stable family life where both the caregivers are in a committed, caring relationship. Legalization of same-sex marriages