In life, many people expect great things to happen in them. Many people view life as a gift with full of happiness. But life seems to have its own course. In reality, life is full of trials and hardships. It is a ubiquitous reality that man suffers almost in a daily basis…
Life will surely give joy and also pain, but meaning does not reside on it. Meaning resides on the very act that man makes in response to those different situations. Man has the power to give meaning to his own life. He has the power to transcend even the most difficult state of suffering.
Frankl viewed man with responsibility. Responsibility entails that man has the freedom and is the author of his life. Man is the sculpture of the meaning of his life and has the capacity to give meaning amidst suffering. Responsibility also entails that man has freedom. Even in the most difficult situation, man has the spiritual freedom that no one can take away. This spiritual freedom is a gift that is endowed in man's being. This spiritual freedom is the freedom to respond and act in man's own way. An example on this is the very experience that Frankl had. Amidst being imprisoned, he decided to bear everything for him to able to be reunited again to his family in the future. In his determination to live amidst difficult situations, he still found meaning in his experience. Such response embodied his spiritual freedom. It is an act that many had failed to do in such situations.
This notion of man in acting his own way also amidst any situation is also called uniqueness. Uniqueness is the capacity of man that makes him different from others. Although all men have freedom, men are uniquely different in terms of how they use their freedom. No man is of exactly the same response to another man if given the same situation. This entails that every man is unique in his own way. Again, uniqueness is evident in Frankl's own manifestation of freedom. Many prisoners in such difficult situations elected to give up their sanity and even their lives. They have the freedom to give meaning to their own lives but their freedom was used in choosing to give up.
Therefore, man has the freedom that entails responsibility. Such freedom and responsibility is then the power give meaning to his own life. For Frankl, it does not matter what man expects from life rather what life expects from man. Hence, man and man alone has the spiritual freedom that no one can take away and this freedom can create meaning and joy even amidst pain and suffering.
RELIGION AND SCIENCE AS WORLD VIEWS
It is always of a discourse when we try to blend in science and religion. Most people find both as two contrasting paradigms. One paradigm must discard the other in order for one to survive. Both don't want to give up in this battle. Both assert their own bearings and man is left in the middle trying to weigh things on where he is to side. Such reality only adds to man's burden. It does not actually help man but only add burden to man, a confusion that man faces in his journey through life. Such reality must trigger what we call twist, that both paradigms must learn to check and balance each other. Both must learn to set their limits and not overlap to each other. Both must learn to know the boundaries and capacity of their study. They must learn to understand questions as can be catered by religion or science. Such teamwork will give birth to a man who is free from confusion. Each field has their own focus of interest; they are both means to unraveling reality of life. There is no way to compare and contrast them because they are not of the same paradigm. They also serve ...
Cite this document
(“Frankl's Notion of Life Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/people/288516-frankls-notion-of-life
(Frankl'S Notion of Life Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Frankl'S Notion of Life Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/people/288516-frankls-notion-of-life.
Toward this end, the focus of this discussion will be directed toward understanding the notion of belief in connection with what the author of Epistemology by Robert Audi (2003) this book claims about the argument from ‘acquaintance’ argument, and in turn, the argument which maintains that perception is a form of knowledge, although indefensible as a form of valid knowledge.
Hobbes included that it became a person’s political obligation to obey the law laid down by the land despite the conditions that were presented forward to the people. He talked about the artificial character that political order possessed in the yesteryears and how the concept may be applied to the state in every generation that passes.
These cultural practices are learnt through social interactions within an organization, and this definition emanates from the view that culture is a social phenomenon. All the practices within an organization are as a result of social interactions. Therefore, the organization work culture can be created in that; it does not subsist on its own.
This means that, for Locke, money is a good method of exchange because money does not decay unlike good like flesh or corn. This also means that money has value and it is a permanent way to determine value because it does not decay. Locke also believes that money is a means of assigning value to one’s property or possessions.
The foremost of the book’s concerns is that of ‘meaning’ pertaining to human life. It talks about how humans miraculously manage to find meaning even in the most despairing, demeaning and de-humanizing of circumstances. One of the insights into human personality traits offered by Frankl is the classification of humans into ‘decent’ and ‘indecent’ types.
Steffan said that Galileo believed that in order to find a causal link, one should be able to manipulate changes and the resultant changes should be reflected as effects of original changes. Thus, if A causes B and changes in A also affect B, causal relationship is established.
We will analyze calms philosophy and then franks philosophy, further trying to find the similarities and differences in both the writers.
The story of The Stranger is narrated by a doomed character, Meursault, and is set between two deaths, his mother's and his own.
Mill’s humanistic assertion “Do no harm” challenges Marx’s apocalyptic call to overthrow bourgeois culture by establishing the integrity of the individual. Thus, Marx and Mill cannot be reconciled, even if one finds abundant evidence in George
can find reasons to live even in the darkest of circumstances and this leads to the idea that no matter how bleak the circumstances may be, there is always hope and a reason to live in the meaning of life. While it has been an influential book for many people and groups, it
The main parts of the story relate to the graduation of the 12-year old girl from eighth grade, when her pride and self-confidence come face to face with the stifling force of racism as represented in the white supremacist speech of Mr.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Frankl's Notion of Life for FREE!