You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Pages 3 (753 words)
One of the topics that has defined medical ethics within the past several decades is with regards to what is become known as physician assisted suicide and/or euthanasia. Whereas suicide has been an alternative individuals to into their lives since the dawn of human history, physician-assisted suicide is something of a new paradigm that allows for individuals who are otherwise terminally ill or have little hope of surviving a particular disease or illness to terminate their lives in what has been deemed as a dignified manner.
As a means of understanding his argument to a more complete degree, the following analysis will integrate with some of his main points and seek to differentiate whether or not his approach is effective and/or reasonable. Firstly, with regards to the ethics of physician-assisted suicide, this is a topic that Velleman discusses prior to engaging on any other point. Rather than say that this practice is patently wrong in each and every situation, he instead says that there are clear cases in which medical care should be withdrawn so that life can end; however, he makes it clear that he is entirely against any active administration of life-ending toxins or drugs to the patient; viewing this as a clear abrogation of the Hippocratic Oath. ...
Not exactly what you need?