Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

The biology of belief by Bruce h. Lipton - Book Report/Review Example

Only on StudentShare
Author : bobby14

Summary

The Biology of Belief by Bruce H. Lipton – A Review First name, last name Subject Professor Submission Date Abstract The Biology of Belief is quite a revolutionary and acclaimed work in the emerging field of modern biology. Through experiments he conducts, Bruce H…

Extract of sample
The biology of belief by Bruce h. Lipton

He realizes that, contrary to popular belief, life is determined more by the environment than it is by our genes. In this book he argues that the DNA is actually controlled by outside signals that are beyond the cells, together with vigorous and persuasive messaging from our positive and negative thoughts. By examining the way the bio-chemical effects of the brain’s functioning, this work seeks show that all the body cells are affected and influenced by our thoughts. He thus tries to help explain the interaction between nature and nurture. In the first chapter, Lipton provides us with his description of cells which he sees as complete entities that are capable of survival by themselves and which have the ability to analyze environmental information. According to him cells can not only learn but they can also transfer their knowledge to their descendants. For instance, when a child is infected with the measles virus, the relevant body cells create protection in the form of antibodies. The cells are able to genetically oversee the manufacture of the new antibodies. An individual is made up of trillions of single-celled citizens that work together in concert with an intimately intertwines structure and function. ...
Download paper

Related Essays

Ontological Arguments and Belief in God.
His argument, however, was wholly rejected by Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas’s suggestion was that there is no way that mere mortals can conceive what God’s nature is, and thus we surely cannot conceive God like Anselm has said we can (Oppy 122-3). Therefore, this argument can be used only by the ones who can understand the true essence of God and that cannot be anyone but God Himself. David Hume was another philosopher who went against Anselm’s argument. His criticism was that it has no evidential reasoning. His argument was that the existence of a being cannot be proved simply through a…
9 pages (2259 words)
Relationship Between Knowledge and Belief. What Role Does Experience and Reason Play in Ensuring our Beliefs Are True
What is important to note here is the underlying significance on the shaping up of beliefs. If these beliefs are not given the room to expand within their entireties, there is little one can do in essence. Similarly, experience and reason have got a due role within the relevant scheme of knowledge and beliefs. Experience comes with an understanding that things can be learned with the passage of time. As far as knowledge is concerned, teacher can teach knowledge but he cannot force his own self to change beliefs and opinions which take a long time to change essentially. Knowledge leads to…
4 pages (1004 words)
The Notion of True Belief
This paper will begin with a brief introduction to some of the crucial, but general aspects of the author’s position, and in turn, proceed to a more pointed discussion of the nature of the notion of belief, according to Audi. According to Audi, the notion of ‘belief’ can loosely be translated as opinion or belief, and it is a term which comes from the Ancient Greek. To claim, or to maintain that there is an ideal form of a belief, is to defend the belief in some sense. For Audi , he presents at the first level, the notion of a belief in terms of the connection with the notion of…
6 pages (1506 words)
James Argument on the Belief in God in The Will to Believe and Pascal's Wager
Therefore, Pascal concludes that any rational being has a duty to believe in God to attain the infinite happiness. However, this argument by Wager raises many critics from philosophers who view the argument as lacking probability in the life of humanity and more so related to belief. Pascal’s argument is viewed as an extraordinary power. The proponents of this argument explain that even though Wager’s argument might be taken as false and a probability taken on this argument, on at the end we might be wrong and the argument might be true after all. Therefore, no matter how small the…
4 pages (1004 words)
Discuss Whether Justified True Belief Can Be Considered Knowledge
Nonetheless, such engagement can also bring one to learn more about knowledge – a term ordinarily thought synonymous with the word ‘know’, when not everything we know constitutes knowledge, not even a JTB? JTB is composed of three concepts – belief, truth and justifiedness. Most basic of which is the understanding of belief, as the question of knowledge here is actually related with belief. To rephrase the main question, if JTB can be considered knowledge, would be: Can belief be qualified as knowledge if it is proven justifiably true? From this question, it can be inferred that not…
8 pages (2008 words)
Explain the true-justified-belief theory of knowledge
For example, if person X sees person Y seating alone at a table in a restaurant and guesses that he is waiting for his wife, while he could be waiting for anyone else from a business partner to a relative or an old friend, he could also be just having a meal by himself. If this proposition is based on a wild guess, even if person Y does turn out to be waiting for his wife given that she arrives a while later, this does not amount to knowledge on the part of person X. When what appears to be knowledge lacks truth, it cannot be considered to be knowledge. It therefore holds that knowledge as a…
3 pages (753 words)
Dialogues concerning Natural Religion: Hume’s Evidentialist objection to belief in God
In addition, I will provide a discussion on why Clark and Plantinga believe that the classical foundationalist must reject classical foundationalist. Finally, I will provide a discussion on the various beliefs that Plantinga thinks are properly basic. These discussions will provide a vista to bring forth arguments on Plantinga and Clark’s arguments against classical foundationalism. The main aspect under discussion, which forms the thesis problem, is the Hume’s evidentialist objection to belief in God being a function of the truths within classical foundations and such truths may not be…
7 pages (1757 words)