Hobbes and Lockes - Term Paper Example

Only on StudentShare

Extract of sample
Hobbes and Lockes

This section compares and contrasts Hobbes’ and Locke’ political theories on the nature of consent and contracts, where they have similar beliefs because they both think that consent is needed to form valid contracts. Hobbes and Locke share similar views on why consent and contracts are needed to cope with the State of Nature. Consent means that people are willing to leave the State of Nature to form a civil society that will serve communal needs and interests. Hobbes asserts that a covenant is needed to create a civil society that evades the State of Nature. He employs several terms to explain the roles of citizens and the Sovereignty in civil society. He uses the understanding of consent in relation to the status of the Sovereign as an Artificial Person by showing, that, by public consent, someone becomes an Artificial Person that has greater power than a natural person. Hobbes describes a person as someone “... ...
Download paper

Summary

Name Instructor Class 9 October 2013 Contracts, Consent, and States of Nature: Hobbes versus Locke Seventeenth-century philosophers were concerned of the transition from no-state to state societies. Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan and John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government explore the transition toward governments and civil societies using the concepts of State of Nature, contracts, and consent…
Author : reingerdelmer

Related Essays

Epicurus and Hobbes Philosophies: Advocating Moral Egoism?
Thomas Hobbes believed that the best way to live life is through an absolute sovereignty in the form of a government (“Thomas Hobbes”). Having different beliefs on methods of how life must be lived, both of them thought that these methods serve the self-interest of individuals. Their philosophies therefore summarize that of a moral egoist which states that it is ethical to do actions that serve an individual’s self-interest or the common interest of a group. It is the objective of this paper to justify the lumping of these two thinkers as moral egoists in accordance to their common...
3 pages (753 words) Assignment
Hobbes and Hume: Covenant
Notably, the covenant has been regarded by Hobbes to be the most significant vehicle that rights are obligated created. In his writing, Hobbes pointed out numerous scenarios that depict that there are no binding covenants as per the state of nature. In regards to the concept of justice, there might be arguments that to some extent justice exist; however, they may not be regarded as valid state of nature covenants. Covenants are contracts that involve mutual agreements that lead to surrender of rights. They are usually the most vital case of contract because they incorporate promises of future...
6 pages (1506 words) Term Paper
Is Thrasymachus and Hobbes right to see human nature in such stark terms, or is Socrates right to see justice as something good in and of itself?
The researcher states that prior to deciding who the righteous intellectual is regarding claims made either for human nature or justice, one might as well begin to consider deliberating upon how each perspective is delivered and which basis or grounds satisfy the premises established. Through Plato’s “The Republic”, a significant part of Socratic philosophy may be said to have been conveyed since Plato himself is subject to the tutelage and influence of Socrates in their period. Though Plato presents a rather limited scope of democracy in dealing with liberty and nature of man, his...
7 pages (1757 words) Essay
Hobbes and Absolute Sovereignty
He criticised several fields and gave argumentative ideas including sovereign governments which this work will be based upon. Sovereign is a state of a people or societies where a group of people or a person has been designated the authority to govern. The sovereign body always has control in religion, finance and military of the society. In this set up, the magistrate does not pledge allegiance to any superior forces or power and he is according to the state orders supreme. The control in the three sections by someone who has not been designated as sovereign in the social sense may as well...
9 pages (2259 words) Essay
Kant and Hobbes Comparison
Both philosophers believe in pragmatism and ethics. But Kant’s practical philosophy is concerned with the unwritten rules that govern human action while Hobbes believes that human actions are directed towards self-interest based on ethical egoism. With this, Hobbes argues that since humans tend to do things based on their self-interest, conflicts may arise when the interest of one overlaps with another or is in opposition to another. This can only be solved if humans allow others to pursue their own self-interest by doing things that will not hamper another’s pursuance of self-interest....
3 pages (753 words) Essay
What is Hobbes’ account of the good?
Therefore, according to him, things are perceived to be good if the repercussions of undertaking it are pleasing to us. There are two forms of motion as described by Hobbes: vital motion, which runs through the entire existence span of a living creature such as the flow of blood and voluntary motion, which is processed through imagination, followed by execution of the thought. In defining what may be perceived as good, Hobbes argues that good usually produces a motion deep inside us; the motion experienced is referred to as ‘delight.’ Sovereign states do play an important role in ensuring...
3 pages (753 words) Essay
Hobbes and Locke - Philosophy Paper
The "nature of state" is that this desire can only be kept under control by the supreme power of the sovereign. In Chapter X Hobbes describes that "the nature of state" cannot be applied to all situation of human behavior....
5 pages (1255 words) Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!