The Jainist approach to ethics is based on self-denial in a somewhat form of bondage in order to conquer all manners of desire and senses to give up all pleasures and passions (Bilimoria, Prabhu, & Sharma, 2007). They believe that the world is made up of two elementary/ basic parts being the living and the non-living and that life is so precious and should not be tampered with at any time. This principle makes the Jainist to not only be vegetarians but only eat the by-products of living things such as fruits and milk only without terminating a life as they have the view that every living thing has a soul. Jainists have the view that there are innumerable substances whereby each has innumerable aspects, and that there are innumerable atoms and souls in the universe that have innumerable characteristics. They also hold the view that all matter and souls have their own independent existence in what is known as the realist pluralism and that every substance has both positive and negative characters. Jainist also respect other peoples view on something as they believe that every substance has multiple aspects and that the knowledge of human is highly limited and cannot know everything about an object and that every judgement is subject to some conditions and limitations. They believe there is no single statement that can explain the complexity of an object and that the knowledge of a thing is determined in relation to another and is relative. Jaina thinkers also hold the view that every substance has an essential character and an accidental character and that the substance cannot exist without the essential character. In a soul for instance, the essential character is consciousness whereas the accidental character of soul is desire, pain, volitions, pleasures and passions (Bilimoria, Prabhu, & Sharma, 2007). In soul liberation, one has to get rid of the accide3ntal characters of the soul in self-denial in order to live in a manner that is desirable and exemplifies respect for the universe. Jainist states that association of the body with the soul make the soul to be in bondage and liberation of the soul can only be achieved through separation of matter from the soul. Thus, it is internal and external passion that leads us to bondage and suffering and liberation can only be achieved through differentiation of the body from the soul. Jainist have ultimate respect for life in a principle and believe that one should not even have the thought of terminating a life and that one should abstain from all forms of desires and worldly passions (Bilimoria, Prabhu, & Sharma, 2007). There is also the principle of abstinence from falsehood for one to be able to conquer the accidental character of the soul and the principle of abstinence from theft as property is accorded the sanctity of life and also abstinence from self-indulgence. On the other hand, the Carvaka is sceptical schools of thought that challenges all other schools of thought including Jainism and Buddhism and seeks to find the truth. It challenges all the traditional values on ethics and takes a dogmatic and sceptic approach to ethics and even the universe, as it upholds materialism whereby
Jainist and Carvaka approach to Ethics Instructor Date This paper will explore the Jainist and the Carvaka approach to ethics with a critical analysis of each approach to determine whether the two approaches are compatible. The paper will give a deeper insight into both the Jainist and the Carvaka approach to ethics and then give an analysis and critique of each approach to measure their practicality and compatibility…
The intention of this study is the Four Principles Approach, also known as ‘principlism’. It constitutes the principles of justice (allotting benefits of a particular decision fairly), beneficence, (doing what is good as this is the prime objective of medicine), autonomy, (giving respect to patients’ right to formulate their own decisions), and non-maleficence (desisting from causing harm to patients).
It not only focuses on what can be achieved and how can we achieve it, but also on what should be required, and would be the right thing to do in the realm of social harmony and fairness. Ethics looks at one’s proper relations along with one’s duties individually and collectively (Blatner).
However, the countries often interact in a number of way a fact that validates the existence of policies governing the international relations of the countries. Among the most common forms of inter countries relationship is through the establishment of multinational corporations such as Coca cola that is American yet access the international market.
This essay analyzes the views of two philosophical standings of the ancient India held by Jainism and Carvaka to identify the similarities and differences between the two in regards to ethics. In addition, compatibility of the two viewpoints will be assessed to identify if the philosophical standings can be viewed.
cs is a set of moral principles held by an individual or a group, encompassing individual behaviour, environmental policy, staff policy, and corporate social responsibility, which has gained importance recently. Maintaining ethics and discharging social responsibility are
The latter is an integral part of the modern society, because it refers to various spheres of life such as religion, social relations and protection, social activities, career making, family life etc.
Ethical norms allow
In this point, it is evident that Plantinga is trying to create a view that science and religion can support each other in line with one consistent belief about God’s existence and his divine works.
Plantinga has two
Ethics looks at one’s proper relations along with one’s duties individually and collectively (Blatner).
Bod is a scholarship student at a prestigious university. On his visit back home, he feels that a distance has
n than not comes with close contract with deontology that stresses on duty to rules and eventually consequentialism that determines the wrongness or rights from the happenings of a particular action. The approach of moral dilemmas rather than the moral conclusion proves to be a
3 pages (750 words)Essay
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you an essay for FREE
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to email@example.com