Dreyfus and Kelly's Take on Nihilism.

Dreyfus and Kelly
Pages 3 (753 words)
Download 0
When seeking to define the philosophical interpretations, a danger is invariably engaged that the reviewer/analyst will lean too closely towards a particular theorist/philosopher in terms of defining such a philosophical interpretation. As such, in seeking to define nihilism, it is necessary to take into account the many different nihilistic interpretations that different philosophers have put forward; yet, at the same time, divorce oneself from two high a level of consideration and/or respect for a given philosophers take upon such a term.


However, this is not the case. Ultimately, what a nihilist believes and understands is the fact that no truth, reality, morality, or levels of any measurable norms can be inferred. As such, the nihilist is led to the understanding that the negation of objective meaning, purpose, or some type of value, is part and parcel of the worldview that such a philosophy espouses. In effect, the reader should come to the understanding that an individual that believed in nihilism would quickly denote that no objective reason or rational exists for any action or consequence; rather, the nihilistic approach would conclude that no moral good or objectivity can be derived from any situation – creating a litany of possible scenarios and outcomes. This can of course be denoted with regards to the means through which well-known philosophers such as Frederick Nietzsche, Soren Kierkegaard, Martin Heidegger, and a litany of others integrated with such an understanding of nihilism and the approach that it portends. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?