Singer further argues that people in rich countries spend their income on things which are effectively useless for them. Singer therefore argues that if people can actually curtail their expenses on unnecessary things and donate them, they can actually contribute towards the improvement in the lives of many. Singer’s thesis is critically more important because it outlines the need to have a broader and compassionate view of the poor of the world and how their lives can be improved with just little bit of effort. Singer therefore suggests that rich should help poor because their help will actually result into greater good for the greatest number of people. He also provides the analogy of Bob Bugati and suggests how people from developed world actually ignore how a small time effort can save lives. Singer than suggests that there may be certain objections as to whether the funds donated or the help provided by the Westerners actually end up being utilized properly. There is a clear argument of whether the aid or the donations offered at the personal level can actually be utilized for the purpose for which they are given. This argument however, been discussed from the point of view how a little bit of research can actually help anyone to find out credible organizations which utilize the overall donations in fair manner. Underlying the arguments of Singer is probably the implicit assumption that money can actually buy happiness. Singer argues that financial donations and help from the rich can actually fulfill the basic and smaller needs of the poor. This ultimately translates into better and improved quality of the life for poor and may pave way for them to engage themselves into something meaningful. The argument of Bob Bugati however, also presents an alternative view of how money can actually restrict rich to help poor as people like Bob may value money and their financial belongings more than the lives of poor living thousands miles away. Singer therefore, appears to be offering both the views that money can actually buy happiness while at the other hand, expensive financial possessions of the individuals can actually deter them to look for helping poor. The overall arguments of Singer are relatively straight forward however, there may be certain point of contention based upon which the overall disagreement can be made. First, the implicit assumption that money can actually buy happiness for the people may not be entirely correct argument. Though, money may be the most essential thing for the survival of the people in poor countries however, there is a need to actually view happiness from multi-dimensional purpose. By associating utility with the consumption of wealth can actually be a flawed argument considering the fact that poor countries have relatively higher level of happiness index value as compared to the countries where wealth is relatively high. Considering this from the perspective of Marxian analysis, one needs to argue as to how to determine what is actually good for the people. To investigate as to what is essentially good for the people may be relatively difficult task because even providing foreign aid may not result into the creation of greater good for the poor because of corruption and other structural issues. Marxian criticism also suggests that
Cite this document
(“A utilitarian approach to poverty Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/philosophy/106378-a-utilitarian-approach-to-poverty
(A Utilitarian Approach to Poverty Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“A Utilitarian Approach to Poverty Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/philosophy/106378-a-utilitarian-approach-to-poverty.
Cited: 0 times
Utilitarianism as a philosophy and point of view is focused upon achieving greatest good for the greatest number of people. It therefore sheds light on the moral issues and where to take moral actions regardless of the overall consequences of such actions on the individuals if that moral action actually results into the greater good for greater number of people…
How Poverty Represents an Unjust Distribution of Wealth Name: Instructor: Task: Date: Introduction When poverty is addressed, implications of wealth distribution are raised within the platforms of the poor and the rich. The definition of poverty is something that cannot be done in a straightforward manner.
Andre and Velasquez argue that utilitarian ethicist may coerce, manipulate or even lie in order to derive the maximum benefit to everyone. In current days, Scientists, diplomats, or business analyst think in terms of benefits and harms while suggesting a ban on certain pesticide, or making an investment in some project, or launching a new drug.
We often ask ‘Why are there still poor people despite progress in economy and globalization?’, ‘What makes us poor?’, ‘Why are the rich getting even richer and the poor getting poorer?’ or ‘Who do we blame for being poor?’. While these typical questions have been heretofore addressed with both objective and subjective responses based on the differing views of individuals who have had the sight and encounter of poverty under various circumstances, their recurrence to our curiosity alludes that poverty is normal and is bound to coexist with human beings at any point in time.
Difference in social class is believed to form a basis for the relative definition of poverty. A person will define poverty based on another’s class and if one party is rich then the other is considered poor. The author illustrates this concept through the narrator’s position that if the audience could be in her position then the audience would understand the meaning of poverty without her explanation.
Historically poverty and affluence have coexisted in the human society (Peter singer 1972). The solutions to the poverty always existed in human morality. When the human conscience is rightly jerked, it is hoped that poverty would no more be seen in the human societies.
The fate of poor people is unchanging mainly associated with insufficient food and clothes. They have to suffer all the societal ill-treatments. They have to be quiet and calm against any social injustice. They cannot have any status in the public life.
Some of the reasons include unemployment, lack of adequate income, circumstances beyond one’s control like divorce or a lawsuit, issues that prohibit family members from working like disability, bad choices like alcohol
This paper seeks to discuss the day today life of poor people concerning the difficulties they face in different life situations.
In the world, health is an international agenda of major concern to all. This is particularly so for people living in abject
This essay elaborates different aspects of poverty in a society which include lack of financial resources, lack of opportunities and lack of awareness. Careful reading of this essay is definitely a heart-touching story of a particular person living
It expands the state of child poverty beyond the classical conceptualizations like low consumption levels and low income. Life begins at childhood and proceeds to adulthood. As a result, studying childhood poverty, its causes, effects and possible solutions will offer
3 pages (750 words)Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic A utilitarian approach to poverty for FREE!